Minutes:
The Director of Schools & Learning introduced the report and outlined the rationale for the report.
Officers explained that the school was required to utilise temporary accommodation facilities in order to continue to deliver its services, due to some classrooms being taken out of commission due to issues with Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) degrading on some buildings on site and rendering them unsafe for use.
Officers explained the long-term solution to the remediation of the building, that the Department of Education would re-imburse costs and that remedial work was expected to be completed in 2028.
RESOLVED:
That the Cabinet
Member for Children, Education and Families, pursuant to contract
standing order 0.08, to:
Reasons for decision
Following an
inspection of teaching Block A at Park View School by an external
structural engineer, Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC)
had been discovered forming part of the structural slab of the
roof. On 14 April 2023, due to the risk of failure and collapse of
this building element, it had been recommended that the top floor
of the building, consisting of 14 classrooms and office space, be
immediately vacated. It had been confirmed by the structural
engineer that the other floors of the building could be safely used
by students and staff. A curriculum and space analysis had been
undertaken and it had been determined that the school required
temporary accommodation including 13 classrooms, 1 shared office
and 4 toilets until the structural issue could be
remediated.
Interim teaching
arrangements had initially been put in place at the school from
Monday 17 April 2023. These had consisted of teaching many pupils
in shared/communal spaces such as the sports gym. This had not been
considered to be a sustainable solution and had been impacting the
quality of teaching and learning. Additionally, the gym had been
required to support GCSE exams from mid-May.
A Cabinet Member
approval had been granted in May 2023 to award a contract to
Portakabin Ltd to provide the required temporary accommodation by
September 2023 for an 18-month hire period at Park View
School.
Construction and
installation of the temporary accommodation had been completed on
programme in September 2023. A variation of the Cabinet approval
had been granted by the Director of Schools and Learning in January
2025, which had included an extension of the rental period to June
2025 whilst a permanent solution to remediate the RAAC had been
developed.
Agreement for funding
of an approach for a permanent solution to remediate the RAAC had
been received from the Department for Education (DfE) in May 2025,
which on completion, would allow students to return to the main
building. The permanent remediation solution had assumed students
would continue to learn in these current temporary classrooms until
the remediation was complete.
The proposed permanent
remediation had been to replace the roof containing RAAC. This had
included removal of all RAAC panels from the school, then putting a
new deck and roof covering on Block A and the section of Block B
that contained RAAC. Consequential works, such as removal and
reinstatement of internal top floor partitions, windows and
services to enable replacement of the roof deck, had been included
in proposals. The indicative date for completion of the roof
replacement works had been summer 2028. Following these works,
students would be able to return to their classrooms in Blocks A
and B and the temporary accommodation would be removed from
site.
The DfE had agreed to
reimburse Haringey for the costs of this temporary accommodation,
including ongoing rental costs required to complete the permanent
remediation.
This temporary
accommodation had been required for Haringey to fulfil its
statutory duty to provide sufficient school places. Without the
temporary accommodation remaining in place until a permanent
remediation was completed, Haringey would have failed to discharge
that duty.
Alternative options considered
Do nothing –
this had been discounted on the basis that Portakabin would have
removed the temporary accommodation if the rental agreement had not
been extended. The Department for Education would not have accepted
this option as it would not have fulfilled the Council’s
statutory duty to provide sufficient school places in an
environment capable of delivering the full curriculum to the
requisite standard. The Council would, therefore, have been deemed
to be in breach of its statutory duty.
Retender the contract – If another contractor had been successful in a further procurement exercise, there would have been additional time and cost associated with design and construction of alternative temporary classrooms, resulting in students going back to short-term teaching arrangements in shared/communal spaces, which would have created severe disruption, impeded the quality of teaching and learning and might not have been compliant with Haringey’s statutory duty to provide sufficient school spaces.
End the contract and
relocate the temporary teaching spaces to an alternative location
within the school – this had been discounted at the outset of
the project following a space and curriculum analysis which had
concluded that there had been insufficient space to make up for the
loss of classroom and office accommodation elsewhere on site. This
would have resulted in the Council failing to meet its statutory
duty to provide sufficient school places.
Relocate pupils to
other schools – this option had been discounted as being
detrimental and disruptive to the children’s education.
Additional temporary accommodation would still have needed to be
procured due to a lack of sufficient overall space on other sites.
This would have incurred additional setup and rental
costs.
Purchase the temporary accommodation – this option had been discounted as the temporary accommodation had been situated on a section of the school playground. The rental contract had included decommissioning and removal of the temporary accommodation. The Council would have incurred an additional charge for removal of these should the unit have been purchased. This option had also been explored in the original tender and had not been considered value for money.
Supporting documents: