Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Filming at Meetings
Minutes:
Councillor James referred to the information on the agenda and
members noted the guidance in respect of filming at
meetings.
|
2. |
Welcome and Introductions
Minutes:
Councillor James welcomed everyone to the meeting and the
members introduced themselves.
|
3. |
Apologies for absence
Minutes:
Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Joseph
Ejiofor, Dr Peter Christian, Dr Will Maimaris, Jennie Williams, Sorrel Brookes, Katy
Porter, and Carmel Littleton.
Lucy de Groot substituted for Sorrel Brookes.
|
4. |
Notification of Urgent Business
Minutes:
There were no items of urgent business.
|
5. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
No
declarations of interest were put forward.
|
6. |
Minutes of the Previous meeting held on the 5th of December 2018 PDF 139 KB
Minutes:
RESOLVED
That the minutes of the previous meeting held on 5th
December 2018 be agreed as a correct record of the
meeting.
|
7. |
Questions and Deputations
Minutes:
Written questions had been received from Haringey Keep the NHS
Public. Councillor James confirmed those questions would be
responded to in writing.
|
8. |
Developing locality-based care in Haringey PDF 227 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Rachel Lissauer, Director of the Wellbeing Partnership for
Haringey and Islington CCGs, introduced this report and
presentation which provided an update on the progress made in
developing place-based care in both boroughs.
With regard to the progress made in Haringey, the following was
highlighted:
-
In September 2018, there had been a launch event
where the Council discussed with frontline staff and residents the
concept of what was trying to be achieved.
-
The Bridge Renewal Trust had carried out surveys
with residents that provided the Council with a detailed
understanding of how residents viewed services.
-
In January 2019, the Council carried out a
‘deep dive’ set of interviews with a broad group of
people who worked in North Tottenham. The responses provided
valuable information on what frontline staff considered to be
working. It also provided insight into the staffs ambitions for the
services.
-
There was a framework group, made up of senior
managers, which received and responded to the priorities developed
by frontline staff through groundwork meetings.
-
Community First had received a positive response
from residents and had been utilised by local area
co-ordinators.
-
An aim of the locality-based care was to develop on
what had already had a positive impact and, where possible,
expanding on that to increase its reach and scope.
-
A more integrated offer needed to be developed
around early years, families of young children, and older
people.
-
The Council had engaged with the voluntary and
community sector to explore what it could do to assist them. The
Council had been asked to help remove barriers that existed which
prevented the voluntary and community sectors from being able to do
all they could in assisting the residents of the
borough.
-
It had been clear that not all residents were fully
aware of the services and help which was available. A key aim of
the locality-based care was to improve residents understanding of
what was available to them by building on the inter-connectedness
of the Council services, voluntary and community
services.
-
Community Cook Up was praised as an event which saw
health and wellbeing staff come together with residents to cook and
eat healthy food.
-
The shared approach to prevention and early
intervention was a core theme of this work. A shared strategic
approach was being developed between Haringey Council, Islington
Council, Haringey CCG, Islington CCG, and other key health
services, for them to sign up to.
-
In North Tottenham, a prototype of the primary care
network was being created, with the grouping of primary care
practices having already taken place. The next stage would be how
GPs integrated within that care network.
-
Regarding forming integrated locality teams,
operational leads from services providing both health and care had
been consulted on how their services were organised and what the
implications for them would be to move towards a locality-based
approach in delivery of services. This work was ongoing and those
operational leads would be further consulted on what working
together more effectively meant to them, such as sharing office
...
view the full minutes text for item 8.
|
9. |
Progress on developing place-based care and support in Islington PDF 307 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Councillor Watts, Leader of Islington Council, introduced the
report on progress on developing place-based care and support in
Islington. The JHWBSC was informed the key aspiration was to
centralise and bring together services in order to more effectively
tackle the issues faced by residents.
Maggie Kufedlt, the Corporate
Director for Housing and Adult Social Services for Islington
Council, outlined the progress made in Islington. The following was
highlighted:
-
There had been workshops and events held with staff
and residents.
-
The five key developments in the localities
programme in Islington focussed on building connections between
teams, engaging the voluntary and community sector, the strategic
approach to prevention and early intervention, supporting primary
care networks, and forming integrated locality teams.
-
Islington had a successful integrated network in
health and care where staff came together to discuss various
issues, such as residents who presented with complex needs, and
assisted them together. The aim was to expand on that existing
integrated network and increase the number of professionals
represented, such as those from housing.
-
There was concern at the lack of understanding by
residents of what services were being provided in North Islington.
The Council sought to address that by having staff and elected
members inform residents at a street level of available
services.
-
There had been a Frontline Managers OD event where
20 frontline managers discussed what needed doing and existing
barriers which prevented staff from being able to do their work.
They also discussed how they could work together as leaders to
overcome those barriers and challenges.
-
A market place event would be held in April 2019,
which would inform residents of the services and what was
available.
-
Engaging the voluntary sector was a key part of the
development in the localities programme in Islington. The Council
would be meeting with the voluntary and community sector
collectively and then individually to discuss their role in the
localities programme.
-
There would be eight smaller networks across the
three locality areas and the GP federation would be leading on that
work.
-
Islington Council sought to have an operating
prototype model by April 2019.
Following both presentations by Haringey and Islington on their
integrated care progress, the following was noted in
discussion:
-
Members of the JHWBSC welcomed the progress made by
both Haringey and Islington.
-
Any operating model created needed to be needs
driven and not criteria driven.
-
The voluntary sector welcomed the proposed
initiatives that increased their involvement within the locality
based care plans. In order for the voluntary sector to deliver the
maximum potential, it was encouraged that any obstacles which
prevented their involvement, should be removed at a strategic
level.
-
Staff on the ground had been energised by the
proposals, particularly within community services in North
Islington and North Haringey.
-
There was concern that GP staff were not as actively
engaged within communities as they could be and this needed to be
addressed for the locality-based care to succeed. It was noted that
the impending proposed change to the GP contract ...
view the full minutes text for item 9.
|
10. |
NHS Long-Term Plan and Implications for Development of Integrated Care PDF 454 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Rachel Lissauer, Director of the Wellbeing Partnership for
Haringey and Islington CCGs, introduced this report and
presentation to the JHWBSC. This report provided a summary of the
NHS Long Term Plan with a particular focus on its implications for
the development of integrated Care Systems in both
boroughs.
The
following was highlighted:
-
The report set out the expectations of what would
happen at integrated care systems level. There were a set of
expectations surrounding health and care budget alignment. This was
permissive in its approach and outlined a range of
options.
-
There was an expectation that integrated care
systems would provide a plan of their approach for NHSE by April
2019.
-
It was expected that the boroughs would be
approached regarding how they saw their integrated care systems
developing. Across the different boroughs in North London, a
simulation event was held which considered what it meant for the
boroughs to work in an integrated care system.
-
The JHWBSC was asked to note the long-term plan and
discuss the ways in which to use the learning from the integrate
events and learning from the work already done in formulating a
response to the NCL.
The
following was noted in discussion:
-
As it was not known at what level the integrated
care system would be set, it was questioned how a response could be
provided given that lack of certainty.
-
Regarding budget alignment, it was queried whether
the Council had any choice in the matter, and what would be the
extent of the budget alignment.
-
It was queried what the role of the public and
democratically elected representatives would be in the integrated
care systems.
-
There was disappointment that social care was not
mentioned within the NHS Long Term Plan.
-
Whilst the NHS was seeking to increase its
contribution to addressing the causes of ill health such as
smoking, it was noted Council efforts in reducing smoking had been
hampered by budget cuts.
-
Cllr Watts stated decisions should be taken at the
lowest possible level or closest to where they would have an effect
in order to maximise the potential of the integrated care system.
The JHWBSC felt strongly that any plan needed to be clear regarding
what was being done and where. In regards to taking decisions at
the earliest available level, Cllr Weston questioned where that
level was set for different services and what was the process to
decide where and how those decisions should be taken if the system
was to be redesigned.
-
The differences in the political visions of the
different North London boroughs was highlighted in making it
unlikely there would be a single shared approach to an integrated
care system. It was recognised that boroughs in North London had
differing needs and requirements across their services and
therefore it would be difficult to create a single system to
accommodate those.
|
11. |
Urgent Items [ if any]
Minutes:
|
12. |
Dates of future meetings
Minutes:
|