Items
| No. |
Item |
134. |
FILMING AT MEETINGS
Please note that this meeting may be filmed or recorded by the
Council for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s
internet site or by anyone attending the meeting using any
communication method. Although we ask members of the public
recording, filming or reporting on the meeting not to include the
public seating areas, members of the public attending the meeting
should be aware that we cannot guarantee that they will not be
filmed or recorded by others attending the meeting. Members of the
public participating in the meeting (e.g. making deputations,
asking questions, making oral protests) should be aware that they
are likely to be filmed, recorded or reported on.
By
entering the meeting room and using the public seating area, you
are consenting to being filmed and to the possible use of those
images and sound recordings.
The
chair of the meeting has the discretion to terminate or suspend
filming or recording, if in his or her opinion continuation of the
filming, recording or reporting would disrupt or prejudice the
proceedings, infringe the rights of any individual or may lead to
the breach of a legal obligation by the Council.
Minutes:
The Chair referred Members present to
agenda Item 1 as shown on the agenda in respect of filming at this
meeting, and Members noted the information contained
therein’.
|
135. |
Apologies for Absence
Minutes:
Apologies for absence were received from Cllr
Blake and Cllr Hymas.
|
136. |
Urgent Business
The Chair will consider the
admission of any late items of urgent business (late items will be
considered under the agenda item where they appear. New items will
be dealt with as noted below).
Minutes:
|
137. |
Declarations of interest
A member with a disclosable pecuniary interest or a prejudicial
interest in a matter who attends a meeting of the authority at
which the matter is considered:
(i)
must disclose the interest at the start of the meeting or when the
interest becomes apparent, and
(ii) may not participate in any
discussion or vote on the matter and must withdraw from the meeting
room.
A member who discloses at a
meeting a disclosable pecuniary
interest which is not registered in the Register of Members’
Interests or the subject of a pending notification must notify the
Monitoring Officer of the interest within 28 days of the
disclosure.
Disclosable pecuniary interests,
personal interests and prejudicial interests are defined at
Paragraphs 5-7 and Appendix A of the Members’ Code of
Conduct.
Minutes:
|
138. |
Deputations/Petitions/Presentations/Questions
To consider any requests
received in accordance with Part 4, Section B, Paragraph 29 of the
Council’s Constitution.
Minutes:
|
139. |
Minutes PDF 264 KB
To approve the minutes of the
previous meeting.
Minutes:
RESOLVED
That the minutes of the meeting on
20th September were agreed as a correct record.
|
140. |
Voids PDF 3 MB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Housing
Panel received a report that provided an update on key aspects of
voids performance, including context on the service’s past
and recent performance, and also provided an update on the work in
progress to improve voids performance under the Housing Improvement
Plan. Accompanying the report was a
presentation tabled by officers and set out in the published tabled
papers pack, that provided further information around voids
performance. The report and presentation were introduced by Jahedur
Rahman, Operational Director, Housing Service
and Building Safety. Cllr Williams, Cabinet Member for Housing Services, Private Renters and Planning was
also present for this item, along with the Director of Housing and
Placemaking. The following arose during the discussion of this
agenda item:
- The Panel
sought clarification about some of the most common reasons a
property became void and the reasons that a particular
property might not be re-let after it became void.
In response, officers advised that the Neighbourhood Moves scheme
often led to chunks of voids becoming available in a particular
ward as people were transferred from a regen property to a new
property. The Council was looking at how it could make sure that it
spent less time doing works and that it could turn properties
around quicker. Officers set out that social housing properties
often became available because of a death and that some of these
could require extensive works as the tenant had either not reported
disrepair or had undertaken renovation work themselves. Officers
advised that they would like to be able to get into those
properties much earlier and to undertake repairs as and when
disrepair arose.
- The Panel queried
whether there was a process in place for vulnerable tenants and
their carers to report disrepair and whether this was acted upon.
In response, officers advised that the Housing Management team
should be aware of vulnerable tenants and that Housing officers
should then be undertaking frequent checks on vulnerable residents
and picking up repair issues as part of those visits.
- The Panel enquired
about the extent to which Housing was joined-up with social
services. In response, officers advised that the relationship was
there and that since coming in-house Housing services had been
building the relationship with colleagues in Children’s and
Adults. Officers advised that they would like to be able to share
more of the data held by those services.
- The Panel sought
clarification around the revised liveable standards. In response,
officers advised that they had condensed the liveable standards
down from around 12 pages to 4, with the aim of making them easier
for residents to understand and also easier to turn around
properties. An example noted of where
an improvement had been made to those standards was that they now
offered a much greater range of paint colours to new tenants of
previously void properties. Rubber mats were offered to reduce
vibrations from the washing machines of neighbouring properties and
new residents were also given the chance to keep the flooring from
previous tenants (as ... view
the full minutes text for item 140.
|
141. |
A new Housing Strategy for Haringey PDF 359 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Panel received a report which provided an
overview of the proposed new Housing Strategy, its context, and the
processes through which it had been developed. The draft Housing
Strategy 2024-2029 was attached as an appendix to the
report. The report set out the content
of the draft Housing Strategy agreed by Cabinet in March 2022, the
consultation on that Strategy carried out between September and
December 2022, and the changes made to the draft Strategy as a
result both of that consultation and of new financial, regulatory,
and legislative contexts. The Panel were asked to provide comments
on the draft Housing Strategy, in advance of December Cabinet. The
report was introduced by Cllr Ruth Gordon, Cabinet Member
for Council House Building,
Placemaking and Local Economy as set out in the agenda pack at
pages 25-138. Also present for this
agenda item were David Joyce, Director Housing and Placemaking;
Robbie Erbmann, Assistant Director of Housing; Hannah Adler Head of
Housing Strategy and Policy; and Marc Lancaster Housing Policy
& Strategy Officer. The following
arose during the discussion of this agenda item:
-
The Panel sought clarification around London
Affordable Rent versus formula rent. In response, officers advised
that that houses build under the previous grant programme 2016-23,
would be built using London Affordable Rent. New Housing schemes
built under the current 2021-26 scheme were limited to social rents
using the formula. This was set by the Mayor of London’s
office and the Council had no control over it. It was noted that
there were some limited exceptions such as building using Right to
Buy receipts and possible future changes to supported housing, that
may allow the Council to use LAR.
-
A Panel member commented that he would like to see a
holistic approach taken to estate improvements, so that the
railings were painted at the same time as major works were
undertaken. It was suggested that this approach was cheaper and
caused less disruption to residents.
-
The Panel also commended officers and the Cabinet
Member on the quality of the design of schemes being built in
Haringey. It was suggested that members would like to see some of
the LBH schemes put forward for awards.
-
A Panel Member commented that by not using LAR, the
Council was severely limiting the number of houses that it could
build. In response, officers reiterated that the GLA funding for
the 2021-26 programme did not allow the Council to use LAR for the
current scheme. Officers sought to reassure members that the Mayor
was giving Haringey a very large grant settlement, one that was
double the previous allocation. The AD for Housing advised that he
was happy with the viability of the scheme and that there were
around 500 homes in the programme.
-
The Cabinet Member advised that part of the reason
that the Mayor’s Office had agreed to give Haringey a
substantial settlement was due to the trust that had been built up
with them, particularly in terms of the fact that LBH has started
...
view the full minutes text for item 141.
|
142. |
Strategic Asset Management and Property Improvement Plan update PDF 532 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The
Panel received a report which provided an update on the progress of
the Strategic Asset Management and Property Improvement Plan
2023-28 and the associated action plans, set out in appendix one of
the report, which captured the recommendations from previous
internal and external audit reports. The report was introduced by
Cllr Ruth Gordon, Cabinet Member for Council
House Building, Placemaking and Local Economy as set
out in the agenda pack at pages 139 to 202. Also present for this
agenda item were David Joyce, Director of Housing and Placemaking;
Jonathan Kirby, AD for Capital Projects and Property; Amanda
Grosse, Head of Strategic Asset &
Accommodation Management; and Sarah Lavery, Head of Property
Change. The following arose during the discussion of this
report:
- The
Panel queried whether the Council would be seeking to acquire
additional property/assets, rather than divesting them, and also
sought clarification about whether the Council would be seeking to
acquire assets outside of Haringey. In response, the Cabinet Member
gave the example of Pendarren House as an asset that Haringey had
outside of the borough and explained that the reason for this was
that it served a strategic objective of the Council. The Council would acquire additional assets if in
doing so it was serving a strategic objective. Examples of recent
acquisitions were 46 homes at the Gourlay Triangle and the
acquisition of property from Grainger on the Wards Corner site.
Officers advised that the Council had to demonstrate a direct
strategic link to its needs in order to acquire properties outside
of the borough.
- The
Panel noted that the report set out that the value of the
Council’s assets was £2.8 billion and queried how this
compared with neighbouring authorities. In response, officers
advised that this figure included everything, including school
estates, not just the commercial portfolio. Officers agreed to come
back with a written response to members about how the value of
Haringey’s assets compared to neighbouring
boroughs. Officers suggested that
Haringey had held on to a lot of stock, but that also came with
challenges due to the age of some of the stock. (Action:
Jonathan Kirby).
- The
Chair sought clarification about the scope of assets captured in
the Plan and whether this related to the General Fund. In response,
officers emphasised the fact that the plan set up a firm structure
so that any decision on acquiring or divesting an asset would go
through the governance structure set out in the report. Officers
advised that the assets referred to everything that was
non-residential and included any acquisition or disposal of assets
regardless of the category of property. This excluded council
housing tenancies.
- The
Panel queried the use of flexible capital receipts, referring to
paragraphs 7.2.4 & 7.2.5 of the report, which stated that the
Council intended to continue with the current stipulation that
capital money could only be used on a project that delivered cost
reductions or transformation, after the government loosened the
rules around this. The Panel commented that it would like to see
...
view the full minutes text for item 142.
|
143. |
Work Programme Update PDF 430 KB
Minutes:
RESOLVED
That the work programme was noted.
|
144. |
New items of urgent business
To consider any items admitted
at item 3 above.
Minutes:
|
145. |
Dates of Future Meetings
·
18 December 2023
·
26 February 2024
Minutes:
·
18 December 2023
·
26 February 2024
|