Agenda and minutes

Please note this meeting may be filmed or recorded by the Council for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s internet site or by anyone attending the meeting using any communication method.  Although we ask members of the public recording, filming or reporting on the meeting not to include the public seating areas, members of the public attending the meeting should be aware that we cannot guarantee that they will not be filmed or recorded by others attending the meeting.  Members of the public participating in the meeting (e.g. making deputations, asking questions, making oral protests) should be aware that they are likely to be filmed, recorded or reported on.  By entering the meeting room and using the public seating area, you are consenting to being filmed and to the possible use of those images and sound recordings.

The Chair of the meeting has the discretion to terminate or suspend filming or recording, if in his or her opinion continuation of the filming, recording or reporting would disrupt or prejudice the proceedings, infringe the rights of any individual, or may lead to the breach of a legal obligation by the Council.

Noted.

Apologies for absence were received from Liz Richardson, David Frith, Nigel Willmott, John Boshier, Richard Hudson, John Thompson and Councillors Jogee and Wright.

None.

It being a special meeting, under the Council’s Constitution Part 4, Section B, Paragraph 17, no other business shall be considered at the meeting.

It being a special meeting, under the Council’s Constitution Part 4, Section B, Paragraph 17, no other business was considered.

The purpose of this report is to seek the views of the Joint Statutory Advisory Committee and Consultative Committee (SAC-CC) on the application for a premises licence to enable the organisation to deliver events effectively in Alexandra Park.

Louise Stewart, Chief Executive Alexandra Park and Palace, introduced the report as set out.  This was a proposal for the Trust to apply for a premises licence for the Park.  The role of the SAC-CC was to provide advice to the Board, who would in turn make a decision as to whether the Trust shall be allowed to apply for a licence.  The application proposed an increase in event days of 34 per year (to 43), which would not include set up or break down of events. 

The Chair asked for comments from the Committee:

a.         The Park needed investment in the infrastructure before extra events could be permitted, although it was also questioned whether it was possible for an increase in events to work in the Park.

b.         Extra events would lead to an increase in noise disturbance to local residents.  It would be important for the Trust to work with local neighbours in order to provide assurances that measures would be taken to mitigate the noise from events.

c.         Committee Members expressed concern that there would not be a balance between the number of events and public use of the Park.

d.         A Committee Member stated that local residents already experienced a number of issues around events – the stewarding, rubbish accumulation, areas of the Park being used as a toilet, lack of access to the Park during events and the impact on the Park.  Residents needed confidence that existing events would be managed better before there was any increase.

e.         Another member of the Committee expressed that they felt events were well managed.

f.          The Chair expressed his disappointment that this was the first time Committee Members had seen this proposal as a licensing application, as he felt that it could have been discussed at an earlier meeting, before submitting an application.  The Chair provided feedback from the Friends of Alexandra Park, where the main concerns were the loss of use of areas of the Park and the potential impact of this on local people, particularly where this was the only access to green space; the concerns over the constraints in the open areas of the Park if vehicles were driving through to set up or take down events, and the associated dangers with this; the cumulative impact to bio-diversity and wildlife in the Park; the damage and deterioration to existing physical infrastructure.  It was suggested that there be a substantial reduction in the number of events.

g.         Jim Jenks provided feedback from Warner Estate Residents Association – the need to generate income must be balanced with the need to maintain the resource as an area of peaceful enjoyment in a city, as well as the need to preserve the natural environment; ‘noise creep’ from any events with amplified sound needed to be addressed, with some independent mediation if required; the impact on local streets with parking overspill and crowds of people leaving events must be considered when reviewing any events in the Park.

h.        The Committee  ...  view the full minutes text for item 17.

Tuesday 22 November 2016

Tuesday 31 January 2017

Tuesday 11 April 2017

Noted.