Minutes:
Samuel Uff, Principal Planning Officer introduced the report for demolition of the existing storage and distribution buildings and redevelopment of the site for 36 homes within 2 x part three, four and five storey blocks and part two, part three storey mews buildings, in conjunction with refuse and cycle stores, cycle and car parking and landscaping.
The following was noted in response to questions from the committee:
· £250,000 was offered for the removal of early and late-stage reviews.
· Within the application there was provision for 3 car parking spaces, this would be implemented gradually as demand arises.
· In terms of the sewers, Thames Water suggested the piling condition connected with foundations works, which is a standard condition for majorplanning applications. They also suggested some informatives.
· The early and late-stage reviews are to capture any uplift in affordable housing. At the moment the scheme was unviable, but there could be some additional viability in the years to come, however, to avoid the need for those reviews to take place, the applicant was posing that they would offer £250,000 to provide certainty on costs.
· Officers looked to futureproof blue badge car parking spaces. The applicant would provide 10% by proposing to provide 3 bays in total, with one to be provided at the outset, and the others to be implemented in the future on a needs basis.
Oscar French attended the committee and spoke in objection.
There was a lack of consideration and engagement towards neighbouring properties. There was no illustrative sections or elevations initially shared with residents. They were not shown the proposed heights or forms and didn't understand the scale of the changes they would face. The height, massing and proximity of the scheme to neighbours are problematic.
Peter Boothman attended the committee and spoke in objection.
This development proposed no affordable housing on site, its height was out of character with the conservation area and it was intrusive of privacy for residents on Trinity Road.
The following was noted in response to questions to objectors:
· There were parking challenges in the area, specifically on a Sunday, due to residents attending church.
· This was not a general objection to the notion of the property being redeveloped, moreso the design of the proposal.
· The windows could potentially be overlooked from the proposed upper floor maisonettes, though they would be 20 metres away from the existing houses. There would also be overlooking of existing gardens; as currently exists from existing windows.
The applicant addressed the committee:
The scheme would be car free and permit free except for one accessible parking space on site, which, could be increased to three spaces if required; and would provide around 400 square metres of communal amenity space, including play space with additional trees and planting further improving the street frontage along the High Road.
The scheme has benefited from 18 months of pre application discussions with Haringey officers and a positive Quality Review Panel review session. During the determination of the planning application, several design changes had been made to address comments raised, including by the local community, including in relation to privacy and overlooking.
The following was noted in response to questions to the applicant.
· There would be sufficient amenity space provided within the development to serve the future residents, and similarly with the play space there would be an adequate amount of space provided for children to play within that development; including if/when the two further accessible car parking spaces were to be provided on site in the future.
· In terms of the heads of terms for the legal agreement, there would be a parking management plan, which would mean that a qualifying resident could apply to have a car parking space converted from part of the landscaping (up to two spaces in total)
· The applicant undertook several consultation meetings in
April 2025, letters were delivered out to 2,143 homes and businesses in the area and there was a website showing details of the project. There were two consultation events held on Monday 28th April and Tuesday 29th of April and information was also circulated to ward councillors and members of the planning subcommittee. Residents were also able to contact Thorncliffe, who were the consultants undertaking the consultation.
The Chair asked Catherine Smyth, Head of Development Management and Planning Enforcement, to sum up the recommendation as set out in the report. The Chair moved that the recommendation be approved following?a unanimous vote.
RESOLVED
2.1 That the Committee authorise the Head of Development Management and Planning Enforcement or the Director of Planning and Building Standards to GRANT planning permission subject to the conditions and informatives set out below and the completion of a legal agreement satisfactory to the Head of Development Management and Planning Enforcement or the Director of Planning and Building Standards that secures the obligations set out in the Heads of Terms below.
2.2. That delegated authority be granted to the Head of Development Management and Planning Enforcement or the Director of Planning and Building Standards to make any alterations, additions or deletions to the recommended conditions as set out in this report and to further delegate this power provided this authority shall be exercised in consultation with the Chair (or in their absence the ViceChair) of the Planning Sub-Committee.
2.3. That the agreement referred to in resolution (2.1) above is to be completed no later than 30 January 2026, or within such extended time as the Head of Development Management and Planning Enforcement or the Director of Planning & Building Standards shall in their sole discretion allow; and
2.4. That, following completion of the agreement(s) referred to in resolution (2.1) within the time period provided for in resolution (2.3) above, planning permission be granted in accordance with the planning application, subject to the attachment of the conditions.
2.5. A summary of the recommended conditions and informatives for the development is provided below (the full text of the recommended conditions can be found in Appendix 1 of the report).
Conditions:
1) Time Limit (Compliance)
2) Approved Plans and Documents (Compliance)
3) Materials and Detailing (Prior to commencement)
4) Boundary treatment and access control (Pre-occupation)
5) Landscaping (Prior to commencement of relevant part)
6) Play equipment
7) Biodiversity Net Gain Plan (Pre-commencement)
8) BNG Monitoring (Pre-occupation)
9) Lighting (Pre-occupation)
10) Noise from building services plant and vents (Compliance)
11) Secure by Design Accreditation (Pre-above ground works)
12) Secured by Design Certification (Pre-occupation)
13) Surface Water Drainage (Pre-commencement)
14) SuDS Management and Maintenance Strategy (Pre-occupation)
15) Piling Method Statement (Pre-commencement)
16) Land Contamination (Pre-commencement)
17) Unexpected contamination (If identified)
18) NRMM (Pre-commencement)
19) Management and Control of Dust (Pre-commencement) 2
20) Delivery and Servicing and Waste Management Plan (Pre-occupation)
21) Construction Logistics and Management Plan (Pre-commencement)
22) Considerate Constructors (Compliance)
23) Energy Strategy (Pre-above ground works)
24) Overheating (Pre-above ground works)
25) Living Roofs (Pre-above ground works)
26) Water Butts (Pre-occupation)
27) Urban Greening Factor (Compliance)
28) Arboricultural Method Statement (Compliance)
29) Tree protection (Pre-commencement)
30) Cycle Parking (Pre-occupation) – ref the external short stay storage
31) Electric Vehicle Charging (Pre-occupation)
32) Accessible Parking Bay(s) (Pre-commencement)
33) Car Parking Management Plan (Pre-occupation)
34) Waste/Recycling Storage (Prior to commencement of relevant part)
35) Restriction to Telecommunications Apparatus (Restriction)
36) Building Regulations Part M (Compliance)
37) Water Consumption (Pre-occupation)
38) Block C - obscure glazing and partial opening windows
39) Communal antenna
Informatives:
1) Heads of Terms
2) CIL
3) Land ownership
4) Construction hours
5) Street numbering
6) Asbestos
7) Designing Out Crime
8) Signage
9) Thames Water build over agreement
10)Thames Water Groundwater
11)Thames Water general information
12)Thames Water Sequential approach to the disposal of surface water
13)Thames Water Mains water for construction purposes
Supporting documents: