The Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment
and Transport introduced the report.
The Cabinet member explained that the proposed Air
Quality Action Plan set out measures to improve air quality in
Haringey between 2025 and 2030. This Action Plan would
replace the Council’s third plan (2019–2024),
published in 2019. It was explained that
Haringey remained committed to making the borough a
better place to live and work. Air
quality affected everyone living and working in the
borough and was therefore an integral part of this
vision.
The Cabinet Member explained that there were a
number of initiatives already in place to improve air quality
both London-wide and locally, and that these had been working
well. The Council intended to build on these initiatives
to further encourage active travel, implement transport
improvements, reduce emissions from new developments, and reduce
exposure for residents. It was explained that the proposed Action
Plan outlined how the Council would
work together to meet national air quality objectives for
nitrogen dioxide (NO?)
and PM10. It was stressed that the
Council recognised that this could not be achieved alone
and took a partnership approach, both across Haringey and
with adjoining boroughs.
Haringey had previously been
awarded Cleaner Air Borough Status by the Greater London
Authority (GLA), which meant the
borough met the following principles: political
leadership, taking action, leading by example, using the planning
system, informing the public, and integrating air quality into the
public health system. While the GLA no
longer awarded Clean Air Borough Status to individual
boroughs, these principles and examples of best
practice continued to be incorporated into the action
plan.
In response to comments and questions from Cllr das
Neves and Cllr Connor, the following
information was shared:
- It was asked
what the impact of the Air Quality Action Plan would be on resident
experience and what the expected achievements of the plan would be.
It was explained that the Council wanted to ensure that residents
had the ability to help in tackling climate change was accessible
to residents, including behaviour and information sharing
programmes were included to ensure accessibility. It was
highlighted that the Council was working collaboratively with other
teams, including the public health team and schools’ team to
ensure that there was a joined-up approach to tackling air
pollutions issues and reduce preventative deaths due to poor air
quality.
- It was
explained that the Council undertook traffic assessments for School
Streets to ensure that the other adjacent roads would not become
dangerous. It was additionally explained that the Council was
undertaking consultation work to understand the impact upon the
road network to ensure a positive scheme.
- It was
explained that the KPIs of the Air Quality Action Plan were
reported on annually.
RESOLVED:
That Cabinet:
- Noted the content of the draft Air Quality Action
Plan.
- Agreed to consult on the Draft AQAP 2025–2030 in
accordance with the consultation plan.
- Delegated the sign-off of the Final AQAP, following public
consultation, to the Director of Environment and Resident
Experience, and the Director of Public Health, in consultation with
the Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment and
Transport.
Reasons for Decision
- Haringey had been declared an Air Quality Management
Area (AQMA) by the Council in 2001, due to air quality levels for
nitrogen dioxide (NO?)
and particulate matter (PMs) exceeding statutory limits.
Haringey’s Annual Air Quality Report showed that
national, regional and local programmes had helped
reduce the number and concentration levels of air pollutants.
Despite this progress, several areas of the borough still
failed to meet UK Air Quality Standards—and no
areas met the WHO Standards.
- Under Part 4
of the Environment Act 1995, Haringey was required to
provide an AQAP to address areas of poor air quality identified
within the AQMA, with a specific duty to monitor and work towards
reducing NO?, NO?,
PM10, and PM2.5.
- NO? was
produced by burning fuel, with road transport and gas boilers
(domestic and commercial) identified as the primary sources in
Haringey.
- PMs consisted of soot, dust, and other secondary
particles formed by reactions in the air. The main sources in the
borough included road transport, construction, domestic
biomass/wood burning, and resuspension.
- The
Government identified poor air quality as the UK’s
largest environmental risk to public health, attributing an
estimated 28,000–36,000 deaths per year to it. Exposure to
NO? and PMs was
harmful in the following ways:
- Short-term
exposure worsened pre-existing conditions like asthma and
increased the risk of cardiovascular events.
- Long-term
exposure increased the risk of respiratory and
cardiovascular diseases, cancer, dementia, and led to
reduced life expectancy.
- Vulnerable
groups, including the elderly, very young, those with health
conditions, and pregnant individuals, were more affected, even
on lower-pollution days.
- The Haringey
Health and Wellbeing Strategy
(2024–2029) highlighted the impact of poor air
quality and made it a key objective within the Healthy Place
Shaping theme. This, alongside the Council’s Joint Strategic
Needs Assessment (JSNA) on air quality, informed the
draft AQAP 2025–2030 and illustrated the
co-benefits of clean air interventions.
- The draft
AQAP 2025–2030 replaced the 2019–2024 plan.
When preparing the new plan, the Council had a statutory
duty to consult with a range of stakeholders, including the
Mayor of London.
- Cabinet delegated the sign-off of the final AQAP to
the Director of Environment and Resident Experience and the
Director of Public Health, in consultation with the Cabinet Member
for Climate Action, Environment and Transport. This
approach was in line with GLA guidance
and ensured Haringey fulfilled its duty under
the Environment Act 1995.
Alternative Options Considered
To not undertake an Air Quality Action
Plan – This option was not viable, as the
development and implementation of an AQAP was a statutory
requirement.
To not consult on the Air Quality Action
Plan – Also not a viable option. Statutory
consultation was required, including engagement
with:
-
The Secretary of State;
-
The Environment Agency;
-
Transport for London and the Mayor of
London;
-
Neighbouring boroughs or district/county
councils;
-
Other public authorities;
-
Local business groups;
-
Other relevant stakeholders.
The statute did not define a minimum
consultation period, but a 6-week consultation was
proposed as standard practice. Other councils had
consulted for periods ranging from 4 to 12 weeks.
An online questionnaire via the Commonplace
platform was planned, with accessible formats provided. During
the consultation period, two community events were
proposed to support further stakeholder engagement.