Minutes:
Sarah Barter, Head of Business Enablement explained and summarised the report.
The report gave an update on the evolution to date of the contract value of the Council’s existing contract with Liquidlogic Ltd (Liquidlogic) and sought approval for a variation of the contract value going forward.
The Cabinet Member for Finance and Corporate Service noted that recommendation 3.2 of the report was seeking agreement for future variation in the contract value by a further £1,303,997 but this was contingency measure to meet any future business requirements identified by Children’s, Adults and Finance Services and to not require a further Cabinet Member key decision. Assurance was provided that services were fully aware and considering the overall budget position of the Council and therefore this was a safeguarding measure.
In noting the above information and before considering recommendation 3.2, the Cabinet Member for Finance and Corporate Services asked that the resolutions reflect that any increased spend over £50,000 on this contract be discussed and consulted on with her.
The Cabinet Member for Finance and Corporate Services,
RESOLVED
Clerks note - Recommendation 3.2 in the published report was incorrectly designated the Cabinet Member for Health, Social Care and Wellbeing to take this decision and this was an error in drafting. The Forward Plan correctly assigned this to the Cabinet Member for Finance and Corporate Services.
Reasons for decision
This would take stock of the increase in the original contract value due to spend incurred during implementation.
This would provide the flexibility to enhance and meet required future functionality to support the needs of Adults, Children’s & Finance services.
This would ensure that the Council were operating a sustainable support model which included the capability to rollout system changes over weekends without requiring down time of the system business hours.
Alternative options considered
Do nothing
This would mean the Council would be unable to identify and implement improvements to the Liquidlogic system for the remainder of the contract period.
Retender
This would mean breaking the contract that is currently in place with Liquidlogic.
Retendering would mean losing the progress achieved through build and
implementation of the Liquidlogic system to reach the current state. It would also
suspend any development of the system during the tender process as we could not
know who would win the tender.
Supporting documents: