Minutes:
Following on from the decision to close Riverpark House there was a subsequent need to relocate the Data Centre. The Council was taking advantage of this move to optimise the environment and to increase resilience.
Cllr Carlin noted that the aim was for the transfer to be completed as soon as possible, so that the closure of Riverpark House could proceed. She was also assured that the current and proposed structure would maintain Council resilience in the face of repeated cyber attacks on all public sector bodies.
RESOLVED
The Cabinet Member for Finance and Corporate Services approved:
valued at £500,000 or more at the time of award may only be awarded, assigned, or novated by the Cabinet), the award of a contract for supply, installation and configuration of a Disaggregated Hyperconverged Infrastructure Platform (dHCI Technology Platform) into two Council Data Centre locations to Supplier A, identified in Appendix 1 - Part B (exempt information) of this report, for 5 years for the tendered contract value of £1,327,567.16 (one million, three hundred and twenty-seven thousand, five hundred and sixty-seven pounds and sixteen pence) subject to the further details set out in section 3.1 of Appendix 1 - Part B (exempt information) of this report).
Reasons for decision
The Data Centre Programme used the required location move as an opportunity
to fully review the current server and virtual infrastructure strategy and to
understand the growth of the server estate over the last 5-8 years. It became
clear there was an opportunity to modernise the infrastructure offering while
reducing the overall footprint, and so power usage, while supporting a key
programme objective to procure a solution that supports the short and longterm
strategic needs of the Council. The proposed contract enables the Council
to meet this objective by the delivery of the new dHCI Technology Platform into
the Council’s Data Centres.
The supplier recommended for award of the contract submitted a strong tender
that clearly demonstrates significant expertise and commitment to providing the
appropriate and relevant solution for the Council’s requirements. The supplier
ran profiling tools on the Council’s systems to understand the actual resources
including the virtual and physical infrastructure and was able to cost the solution
to reflect this. The supplier’s tendered costs aligned to the discovery phase
estimates.
The recommended supplier showed a strong understanding of the Council’s
requirements in its quality submission, demonstrating experience in similar
projects and clear processes to deliver successfully.
5. Alternative options considered
Do Nothing
This option, which would involve not awarding a contract to deliver the dHCI
Technology Platform and would leave end of life legacy equipment to be
relocated into data centres, is not recommended as any equipment failure
would cause significant outages for the Council. There is also the need to relocate the data centre in order to close Riverpark House.
Ad-Hoc Replacement of Hardware
As with the Do Nothing option, this approach could have been adopted.
However it would ultimately result in the Council using more rack space and
power in the data centres and ultimately the cost of the hardware over the
next two to three years would be the same as for procuring the new platform.
Supporting documents: