Tim Mpofu introduced the
item. This report provides the Pensions Committee and Board (PCB)
with the following updates on the Pension Fund’s performance
for the quarter ended 30 September 2023.
a. Independent advisor’s market
commentary
b. Investment performance
c. Investment asset allocation
d. London Collective Investment Vehicle (LCIV)
update
e. Funding position update
The following was noted in response to questions
from the committee:
- Investments
in the London CIV were approximately 76% of total fund assets The
funding position as of 30th of November had been included in the
confidential appendix. The funding position for the pension fund
was 139%, as per the Fund Actuary’s latest
estimates.
- Cllr
Iynkaran questioned the performance of
the portfolio. Tim Mpofu explained that
there were assets within the portfolio that had not performed as
expected due to the changes in economic conditions. The
Fund’s allocation to Index Linked Gilts was an example of one
of the asset classes that had underperformed. Although inflation
had increased, the impact from the increase in interest rates had
resulted in significant mark-to-market capital losses. There were
also some asset classes that were not revalued on a regular basis,
and as a result there would be a lag in terms of their performance.
It was further noted that although property had underperformed
during the period, it was still considered appropriate for the Fund
due to its payment of distributions and income generation
characteristics.
- Keith Brown
flagged that he would caution about putting too much emphasis on
the total fund performance relative to the total fund benchmark.
This was because for quite a few of the asset classes, they were
quite difficult to benchmark as well as being lagged.
- In response
to a query regarding performance reporting, Tim Mpofu suggested that the team could work on
different models and explore how the existing performance reporting
could be further improved. Traditionally, the fund’s approach
had been to use the Fund’s benchmark as a means of checking
whether the asset manager was delivering on their performance
objectives. It did not necessarily attribute the performance of the
Committee and Board’s own investment decision making
process.
- The Chair
sought clarification from Mercer in relation to private debt and
whether this should be something still investigated. He also
flagged if there could be a report of other asset classes for
future investment strategies. Alex Goddard, Mercer, explained that
private debt continued to be an asset class that investment
managers spoke to LGPS funds about and it was at a floating rate.
As interest rates have gone up there, returns had gone up as well.
This is why some had seen it as appealing, and it would fit within
that diversifying alternatives bucket. The question would be, if
the committee were going to look to allocate this, where they would
allocate this from. That would be a discussion that needed to be
had across a range of asset classes.
Cllr Mark Blake attended the committee and read out
a statement:
Cllr Blake expressed, in his view, that the local
government pension scheme continued to hold 4.6 billion pounds in
investments in companies which were operating in Israel &
Palestine. He asked what actions the committee had taken to divest
Haringey pension funds from these companies.
Cllr Mahbub acknowledged
this statement and confirmed that a fuller response to the letter
referenced in his statement would be provided after the PCB had had
an opportunity to consider its contents.
RESOLVED
To note the information provided in section 6 of
this report regarding the Pension Fund’s investment
performance and activity for the quarter ended 30 September 2023.
An additional supplementary appendix has been included which shows
the Pension Fund’s asset values as of 30 November
2023.