Nicola
Theron, Director of Estates for the NCL ICB, introduced this item
noting that a number of specific questions asked by the Committee
were addressed in the report. She highlighted the recent progress
of the Estates Strategy including investment in the Primary and
Community estate, with a number of new build and refurbishment
projects set out in the report. An update was provided on the St
Pancras Transformation Programme and asset disposals were also
described in the report with an uptick in 2027/28. The graphs on
page 18 of the agenda pack illustrated the critical backlog
maintenance of around £121m with the effective maintenance of
estates essential to deliver good quality patient care.
Nicola
Theron explained that there were corporate expenditure limits on
the overall capital and leasing spend for NCL which was £178m
this year. It was necessary to work carefully and creatively to use
not just national capital but also other sources of funding. NCL
was one of the few ICS areas to set aside 5% of the capital budget
for primary/community services. The Community Investment
Fund/Section 106 (CIL/S106) funding was a significant source of
funding as illustrated in the report.
With
regards to Local Estates Forums (LEFs), the list of local authority
representatives was provided in the report and this included a good
range of senior officers and policy leads but more limited
representation from Councillors.
Nicola
Theron then responded to questions from the Committee:
- With regard
to the St Pancras Transformation Programme, Cllr Connor asked about
risk and financial stability for the second site. Nicola Theron
said that the Moorfields site was being
delivered separately from the second site where there were a series
of other transactions, including a partnership with the private
sector that was adding skills and expertise to the project. The
programme was operating in difficult market conditions in terms of
disposals and construction. The objective was to align the whole
long-term programme and various sources of funding with the
objectives of optimising health outcomes and ensuring minimal
disruption. Sarah Mansuralli added that
the programme involved a sequence of planned transactions so there
was always a risk concerning the transactions being completed
within the planned timescales. There was therefore a lot of focus
on risks and mitigations throughout the programme. Cllr Connor
requested that progress with the project and the associated risks
be included in the next update report to the Committee in 12
months’ time. (ACTION)
- Asked by Cllr
Connor about the 28% of NCL patients who access primary care from
inadequate ‘tail’ estate, as illustrated on page 18 of
the agenda pack, Nicola Theron said that the principle worked to
was that health outcomes were better achieved in larger, better
quality estates and the national policy was that commissioners
should promote the delivery of services from ‘tail’
estate to ‘core’ assets.
- Asked by Cllr
Cohen whether the Edgware disposal was linked to the overall major
planning changes for Edgware town, Nicola Theron confirmed that
this was dealt with as a separate issue.
- Cllr Cohen
queried why 60% of the £9m allocated to NCL health from the
planning system so far was from Barnet. Nicola Theron explained
that this indicated the current degree of involvement between
Barnet Council and the NHS in supporting development, including
through S106 agreements such as a long-lease on two units for
primary care services in Colindale. Cllr White questioned whether
other NCL boroughs were expected to contribute more in future.
Nicola Theron said that there were a lot of asks for CIL/S106
funding so the aim was to work in a more integrated way across NCL.
Barnet had contributed a high proportion recently due to the large
amount of recent development in that Borough.
- Asked by Cllr
Cohen how often the LEFs met, Nicola Theron said that this was
typically once every two months.
- Cllr Clarke
requested further explanation of the proportion of capital funding
provided by the government and whether this was sufficient. Nicola
Theron clarified that the Department of Health and Social Care
provided the £178m referred to earlier but that the capital
ask in NCL was around 5-7 times that amount to bring the whole NHS
estate up to modern fit-for-purpose standards. This was why it was
necessary to recycle and find other sources for capital
investment.
- Asked by Cllr
Clarke about the limited amount of affordable and key worker
housing involved in the development resulting from the Edgware
disposal and asked why the NHS did not make this a condition of the
sale of the land. Nicola Theron responded that NHS Trusts were
sovereign organisations and that 50% of the capital from the
disposal would be reinvested back into the Edgware Hospital estate
with the other 50% going to NHS PS (Property Services) to be
reinvested elsewhere. She added that there was work ongoing
throughout NCL to maximise the number of key worker units and that
there was a balance to be struck between developing affordable
housing and securing capital receipts to be recycled into new
projects.
-
Cllr Connor noted the high level of critical backlog
maintenance for NCL ICS provided and requested further explanation
on how this could impact on frontline services. Nicola Theron said
that hospital Trusts had a lot of capacity to plan how to manage a
backlog and that, while they were sovereign organisations, the ICB
had a role in working with providers to ensure that there was a
consistency of approach on risk registers, the management of
critical items and ensuring that the system as a whole was not
exposed to unmitigated risk. She also noted that around 70% of the
£178m capital spend in NCL was allocated for maintenance
issues. She acknowledged that the critical backlog maintenance
figures had risen in recent years with various contributory factors
including aging assets, greater mechanical/ventilation requirements
resulting from Covid and two hospitals
with RAAC concrete issues. Sarah Mansuralli added that there was a huge evidence
base on the importance of delivering care in a fit for purpose
environment and the ICB was constantly seeking to attract capital
from a range of sources. Nicola Theron commented that all
Integrated Care Systems across the country were facing similar
issues and that it was necessary to make the case nationally to the
Treasury that more capital resources were required to bring the NHS
estate up to the required standard.
Cllr
Connor proposed that the next update report in 12 months’
time should include:
- A progress
update on the St Pancras Transformation Programme, particularly the
various transactions relating to the second site and the associated
risks.
-
A breakdown of the critical backlog maintenance by
provider, including details of the year-on-year changes and any
identified potential risks to patients. (ACTION)
It was
also suggested by the Committee that there should be a clearer
understanding of how the planning departments of local authorities
could work with health partners on CIL contributions.
(ACTION)