Dan Paul, Chief People Officer,
introduced the report as set out in the agenda pack. There were
five HR policies which had proposed changes for
approval.
Probation Policy:
The following was noted in
response to questions from the committee:
- In terms of schools,
HR services were traded. It was noted that Schools buy into these
policies and could buy these from anywhere. They would use the
policies that were provided by their HR provider. The team
regularly review and update Haringey corporate policies and school
policies.
- There would be a
6-month period where the manager would be monitoring performance.
In terms of the managers assessment, if the employee had not
demonstrated strong performance; HR would provide support mangers.
There would be accompanying practice notes which would give
managers guidance in helping people meet targets. If there were any
problems, managers would be directed to the employee relations
team, the team would check documents with the manager and ensure
they had followed all guidance. In some cases, the team have had to
go back to managers where there had been an evident lack of support
for the employee. Sometimes probation would be extended to allow
employees to meet their objectives.
- In terms of the ratio
of managers to employees, high numbers were seen in some services,
such as the Transport service team, which is a bigger team. HR
advice was to phase recruitment where possible to ensure there are
not a lot of new starters at one time within a team. Processes had
also been simplified, for example probation policy documents would
be easier to use for managers and employees.
The Job Evaluation Policy:
The following was noted in
response to questions from the committee:
- Pay
protection was in line with council policy at the time of the
change. Employees under redeployment would receive pay protection
for 18 months. This was in line with the organisational change
policy.
- With the job
evaluation process, employees and managers could request a
review.
- Trade union
representatives were paid for their substantive roles.
The Elections Staffing Policy:
The following was noted in response to questions
from the committee:
- The Elections
team have an aim to increase the number of council staff working on
our elections. A recruitment event for this was being held w/c
2nd October.
- The Council
did not employ elections staff, they were employed directly by the
Returning Officer however there were no specific prerequisites.
There were still several exclusions when recruiting in elections to
ensure the vote was fair and seen to be fair.
- The incentive
of two days off would be attractive for enough people, if this were
not the case then this could be reviewed.
Proposed changes to the recruitment policy in
relation to internal recruitment:
The following was noted in response to questions
from the committee:
- All policies
had been agreed by trade unions.
Proposed changes to notice periods:
The following was noted in response to questions
from the committee:
- Casual
workers and agency staff did not have a notice period. This would
run the risk of turning agency staff into employees, agency staff
also did not receive sick pay.
- The 6-week
notice period was a collective agreement with trade unions.
Currently, notice should be given to the end of the next calendar
month. The change to 6 weeks would make this a fixed period in
between the current uncertainty.
Annual pay policy statement 2024-2025:
The following was noted in response to questions
from the committee:
- Annual cost
of living pay rises are part of a national negotiation process.
During this process, several factors were considered.
RESOLVED.
To approve each of the attached policies, and
delegate authority to the Chief People Officer to make such
amendments as considered minor.