Minutes:
This report sought a determination of a number of applications made by Festival Republic Ltd (the Applicant) to hire Finsbury Park for a period in June/July every year between 2023 and 2027, in order to stage two consecutive three-day multi-event weekends.
The applications were required to be determined pursuant to the Council’s Outdoor Events Policy (the Policy), which was approved by Cabinet on 17 December 2013 and implemented on 7 January 2014.
The Leader of the Council noted that Councillor George Dunstall had contacted Democratic Services prior to the signing to ask to place on record his objection to the duration of the contract hire of Finsbury Park for five years.
Councillor Alexandra Worrell had made representations during the
consultation period.
The Leader of the Council had asked for the Contract hire agreement to include an annual performance review and this would be included.
The Leaderof the Council had asked for the annual performance review to include engagement with: ward councillors of Stroud Green and Harringay wards, local stakeholders, including the Friends of Finsbury Park. Legal advisors were content with these caveats and the monitoring arrangements for the contract which was in keeping with the Council’s general expectations.
The annual engagement process would be developed and as part of the performance review there would be a re-write of the terms of reference for the Finsbury Park Events Stakeholder Group . There would be a schedule setting out when the meetings would take place, both with the Stakeholder Group but also with ward members.
Further to considering the exempt information,
The Leader of the Council RESOLVED
Reasons for decision
Under the terms of the Policy, applications of the type detailed in the report would be required to be determined with the prior agreement of the Cabinet Member.
If authority was given, then officers would give in-principle agreement to the Applicant for the event applications to progress. The events would then be subject to lengthy discussions with relevant authorities-including Licensing-before final approval was given.
The rejection of the applications would have implications for the Parks & Leisure Service budget and reduce the opportunity for reinvestment into Finsbury Park (the Park). It would also mean that the wider cultural and economic benefits to the borough were lost.
Alternative options considered
In adopting the Policy, the Council established its commitment to using the Park for a limited number of major events each year. Accordingly, the only other alternative option which could be considered would be to reject the applications. That option was rejected, on the grounds that the events did not fall within any of the grounds set out in paragraph 5.3 of the Policy for automatic refusal.
Supporting documents: