Agenda item

Cabinet Member Questions

An opportunity to question the Cabinet Member for Health, Social Care & Well-being, Cllr Lucia das Neves, on developments within her portfolio.

Minutes:

Cllr Lucia das Neves, Cabinet Member for Health, Social Care and Well-being, began this item by setting out some recent developments in her portfolio area:

  • Mental health was a key priority area and the public health team had recently held a workshop with mental health providers across the borough from the statutory and voluntary/community sectors to discuss existing services and possible gaps. She acknowledged that Councillors had been concerned about some of the casework that they had picked up around mental health issues and wanted to see more preventative action and the addressing of gaps in services.
  • Gambling harms was also an important issue and, while the Council was limited in how it could prevent gambling establishments from opening in the High Streets, efforts had recently been made to look at support services. A summit had recently been held around gambling harms and a government White Paper was expected soon.
  • On the issue of Violence Against Women & Girls (VAWG), Cllr das Neves had recently visited a secondary school in the Borough along with a worker from Solace Women’s Aid and had a good conversation with young women about what they experience in schools. This raised questions about ensuring that girls and boys in schools across the whole borough had access to those type of conversations. The Council would soon begin the process of commissioning VAWG services and this would involve Councillors and people with lived experience. The reach of services had been increased to include older women and LGBTQ+ women.

 

Cllr das Neves then responded to questions from the Panel:

  • Cllr Connor noted that the Overview & Scrutiny Committee had recommended in 2022 that research be undertaken in Haringey to strengthen the evidence base on gambling harms, which could potentially be used as part of a decision to refuse applications for gambling licences. Cllr das Neves said that the Council had been waiting for some considerable time to hear about potential funding for this. She added that some useful conversations had emerged from the recent summit with people who were interested in being involved with this work so it was hoped that progress could be made on this soon. However, she was not persuaded that the research would necessarily enable the Council to refuse licensing applications due to the emphasis of national legislation on permitting applications and so the content of the Government’s forthcoming White Paper would have to be looked at closely. In response to a question from Cllr Opoku about what Councils can do collectively, Cllr das Neves said that she had been speaking to some of her NCL counterparts about this and one option could be a collective written response to the Government’s White Paper after it was published.
  • Asked by Cllr Abela for further details on the support provided to residents dealing with gambling addiction, Cllr das Neves said that people could access a helpline but there were two workers who were going to come in to provide coaching and psychosocial support, including by having a presence on the High Street. Cllr das Neves said that she could provide further details about this work through a written response. (ACTION)
  • Cllr Connor requested further details about the commissioning of VAWG services and the likely timescales for this. Will Maimaris, Director of Public Health, said that the ‘Protect Our Women’ project that was being delivered with Solace was an innovative programme that had been recognised at a recent London-wide meeting as being an example of good practice. However, it was a small project and it would be continuing until at least April 2024 so any recommendations for change from scrutiny would be welcome. Cllr das Neves added that feedback from young women at a Haringey school had included that they felt objectified by society and so it was important to listen to those messages and to ensure that these issues were acknowledged in all schools.
  • Cllr Mason noted the recent legislative change through the Domestic Abuse Act with children classed as victims and asked what support was being provided to children in such circumstances. Will Maimaris explained that an Independent Domestic Violence Advocate (IDVA) for children had recently been commissioned and would be linked to children’s social care services.
  • Cllr Mason highlighted the importance of children themselves being advocates for change in terms of the culture around VAWG. Cllr das Neves agreed with this and reiterated the strong clear voices of the young people that she had heard at the school recently who she hoped would be supported to lead on this issue. 
  • Asked by Helena Kania whether there were any figures available on the number of NHS health checks (for those aged 40-74) being carried out, Will Maimarisexplained that the budgets for this were under significant pressure and so a decision had been made some time ago to prioritise the east of the borough due to the higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease. It had been difficult to get GP surgeries to pick up those checks, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic, and so the GP Federation had recently been commissioned to improve this. The figures for the NHS health checks could be provided to the Panel in writing. (ACTION) Vicky Murphy added that health checks for children and adults with learning disabilities were at 72.5% in Haringey as of January which was the highest rate in the NCL area. Asked by Cllr Peacock why the health checks stopped at age 74, Will Maimaris said that the checks were intended for prevention and that those in the older age brackets should typically be seeing their GPs on a regular basis for other reasons.
  • Cllr Brennan noted that the Solace programme had been active in some schools and asked whether there was a target for it to reach all schools in the Borough. Cllr das Neves said that there was not a specific target but that the issue was resourcing the programme and prioritising the areas that it ought to reach sooner rather than later. However, she felt that young people had responded well to the Solace worker and that ideally they would be going into every school as soon as possible.
  • Asked by Cllr Peacock about action to support residents with dementia, Cllr das Neves said that she had recently attended virtual reality dementia training in Wood Green which aimed to simulate dementia and this training would be used by people working with residents who have dementia. She added that there were good dementia services in the Borough and that a new dementia coordinator would be starting soon to help boost outreach work.
  • Cllr Connor asked whether new dementia hubs could be established, similar to those in Wood Green and Tottenham, as these could help to attract residents and provide support in a more focused way. Cllr das Neves said that this was a good question that could be wrapped into a conversation about localities and what could be made available, perhaps though the JHOSC (Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee). Cllr Brennan commented that there were some good dementia services in the Borough but that more needed to be done to communicate this to residents. Beverley Tarka responded that this would be an important part of the new dementia coordinator role and help to build a Borough-wide support network for people with dementia. Cllr das Neves said that there needed to be information provided in both electronic and print formats and that this was part of a larger piece of work within the Council of communicating better with residents about all the services available to them.
  • Cllr Connor raised a concern that had emerged from a recent Carers Forum meeting where it had been understood that carers of people with disabilities who were on Income Support would have to pay a charge to the commissioning unit. Vicky Murphy clarified that this was a communications error and that this information was not correct. She explained that anyone receiving benefits would not be expected to pay the kind of amounts that had been mentioned. Everyone would have an individual financial assessment and it had also been agreed that an advice surgery would be held once a month at the Winkfield Centre to support people with learning disabilities and their families/carers in going through this process. Cllr das Neves suggested that a written response could be provided to help clarify this matter and provide some reassurance to those with concerns. (ACTION)