The Cabinet Member for Housing
and Estate Renewal introduced this report which sought Cabinet
approval to make the necessary decisions to incorporate
Haringey’s Wholly Owned Company (WOC) for housing
development. The Cabinet Member noted the Labour administration had
been elected on a manifesto which had placed housing at its core.
The manifesto had committed to deliver at least 1,000 new Council
homes at Council rents by 2022. This was the latest report that had
the recommendations to put in place the structures to deliver those
homes.
The Cabinet Member referred to
the Labour administration’s preference in the Manifesto was
to build Council housing directly through a company we fully own.
However, this was at a time when the GLA funding was not available
and was before the announcement in the October budget of the
scrapping of the HRA borrowing cap. The Council had since
considered what those changes meant for housing delivery in the
borough, and the role that the Company could best play in making
that delivery happen.
The Cabinet Member stressed the
recommendations Cabinet were asked to approve would create the
housing company contained within the Labour administration’s
manifesto, to support the creation of new Council homes for
Haringey families on the waiting list.
Clerk note - Cllrs Bevan and Rossetti addressed the Committee in
their capacity as board members of Homes for Haringey and as
Councillors.
Following questions from Cllrs
Bevan, Dennison, Williams, Rossetti, Brabazon and Carlin, the
following was noted:
- Homes for
Haringey (HfH) is an Arms-Length Management
Organisation (ALMO). The Cabinet Member noted HfH could be
supported to create new Council homes in the future but that was
not the commitment the administration had made within its
manifesto. The manifesto had made a commitment to directly creating
those Council homes, not at arms-length, which is what HfH
effectively was to the Council. This consideration was set out in
the July Cabinet report on the WOC.
·
The Cabinet Member held frequent discussions with
the Managing Director for H4H and discussions had been productive
but it was accepted the direction of travel was for the creation of
a WOC and for HfH to continue to it’s current role. July
Cabinet had considered the option of exploring creating the 1,000
new Council homes with HfH but this was ruled out for the reasons
contained in that report to Cabinet
- Officers
referred members to the 17th July 2018 report entitled
‘Setting up a Wholly Owned Company for Housing
Development’ to Cabinet where the option to explore
creating Council homes through the HfH had been explored as an
alternative option but was not pursued for the reasons set out in
that report.
- Contractual
arrangements would be sought with companies to build any new
properties, which would follow the usual tender process. Once
built, HfH would be managing those newly built Council
properties.
- The Cabinet
Member highlighted the Labour manifesto had given the
administration the mandate to set up a wholly owned company and
this was what the administration would pursue. The Leader noted the WOC was within the parameters of the Labour
Manifesto.
- Regarding
the governance, Officers confirmed no Councillors would be on the
board of the proposed WOC given members would set the parameters
within which the company would operate through the business plan
and the board would be enforcing what members had set in the
business plan.
- It was
correct that Cabinet at its meeting of the 17th July 2018 had
agreed to allocate a maximum of £500k of flexible
homelessness support grant to the establishment of the company.
However, Officers confirmed that figure was set at a time when the
WOC was expected to be the main vehicle for the development
programme but, with the lifting of the HRA borrowing cap, this was
not this case moving forward, and so it was expected the figure of
£500k would be significantly reduced. It was also not
expected that the Council would incur such level of costs even with
the creation of the other companies it was proposing to set up.
Furthermore, all of the proposed companies
contained within the report would have an impact on reducing
homelessness in the borough. The purpose of the WOC was to hold
forms of rented housing which were not social rented housing and
could therefore not be held within the HRA. The Council
acknowledged that that type of housing was a potential solution for
certain homelessness family’s needs. That was why the Council
was interested in developing that type of housing within the
borough and officers were wholly satisfied this was an appropriate
and legitimate use of money from the flexible homelessness support
grant. This was confirmed by the Council’s legal
team.
- The
Council’s finance and legal teams had had sight and commented
on the financial implications and legalities of all aspects
contained within this report. In addition, this report had two
previous associated reports, which, similarly, went through the
same rigorous clearance process with both teams satisfied they
complied with the relevant financial and legal
frameworks.
- Due to the
change in the HRA borrowing cap, this meant the Council was in a
position to build a number of the social homes properties itself.
The Cabinet Member noted they would be subject to Right to Buy but
this would have been the case even if the homes had been built by
HfH within the HRA. The WOC was proposed to accommodate different
types of rent.
- The Cabinet
Member accepted the risk of Right to Buy but felt strongly that
secure tenancies were the most appropriate type of tenancy a
Council should offer, given the guarantees this offered to tenants.
Only a Council was able to offer a secure tenancy and a WOC would
not be able to provide this on its behalf.
- The Cabinet
Member informed that certain schemes required a mixture of
properties to ensure they were financially viable. The WOC gave the
Council the capacity to have a combination of rents in the scheme
to make it financially viable but still able to exercise a degree
of control over its direction than if it were to collaborate those
products with a private developer.
- Intermediate rented homes would not count towards the 1,000 new
homes commitment in the Labour manifesto. Such rented homes were
important in making schemes viable and would help the Council in
its pursuit of creating those 1,000 new Council homes by supporting
it financially. The Cabinet Member noted the report could have been
clearer concerning the role of the intermediate rented
homes.
- Officers
confirmed the HRA could develop housing that was not for social
rent but if the Council wished to hold a particular type of home
and rent it out at a different rent to that of social rent, it
could only do so through a WOC. The WOC provided the Council with
flexibility and options for the future if, for example, it sought
to provide homes at market rent. All homes would be developed by
the HRA and if and when those properties would be moved to the WOC,
the WOC would effectively buy those homes off the HRA using the
general fund borrowing.
RESOLVED
- To agree the
Company’s name as ‘Haringey Housing Company
Limited’, and give delegated authority to the Director of
Housing, Regeneration and Planning and the Chief Finance Officer
(s151 Officer) to agree the final wording of the Articles of
Association and Memorandum of Understanding as set out in draft
form in appendices 1 and 2.
- To agree that the
purpose of the Company will be primarily to facilitate the
Council’s ambitions to deliver new homes and to hold homes
developed by the Council that cannot normally be held in the
Housing Revenue Account, for example intermediate and other
non-social rented homes.
- To agree the
appointment of the following Directors of the Company:
·
A senior housing officer nominated by the Director
of Housing, Regeneration and Planning;
·
A senior finance officer nominated by the Chief
Finance Officer (s151 Officer) and
·
A senior legal officer nominated by the Monitoring
Officer.
To
agree the creation of a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to
be registered as a Registered Provider to be called the
‘Haringey Housing Company Registered Provider Limited’
(the “Company RP”); and give delegated authority to the
Director of Housing, Regeneration and Planning and the Chief
Finance Officer (s151 Officer) to agree the final wording of the
Articles of Association and Memorandum of Understanding as set out
in similar draft form to the Company in appendices 1 and
2.
- To agree that the
purpose of the Company RP will be primarily to hold homes developed
by the Council that would be held by the Company but are required
to be held by a Registered Provider; and that Officers seek
registration of the Company RP as a Registered
Provider.
- To agree that the
composition of the Board of Directors of the Company RP shall be
the same as the Board of Directors of the Company.
Reasons for decision
On 17 July 2018 Cabinet agreed
to the setting up of the Company, subject to the documents needed
for its incorporation being agreed by Cabinet. The Articles of
Association and Memorandum of Understanding of the Company and the
Company RP have been drafted by the Council’s external legal
advisors and Cabinet is being asked to consider these documents so
the Company and the Company RP can be incorporated.
The July Cabinet Report
described the primary purpose of the Company as being to maximise
the delivery of new Council owned homes and this remains the
primary aim of the Council’s housing delivery programme.
However, following the abolition of the HRA borrowing cap, the
Company’s role within the programme will be to support the
Council’s ambitions to deliver new homes, primarily by
holding those homes that the HRA cannot.
The members of the Board of
Directors of the Company need to be appointed. These will be
Council officers, namely a senior officer nominated by the Director
of Housing, Regeneration and Planning, a senior finance officer
nominated by the Chief Finance Officer (s151 Officer) and a senior
legal officer nominated by the Monitoring Officer. The Chief
Finance Officer (s151 Officer), the Monitoring Officer and any
officer with direct responsibility for planning have been
deliberately excluded, to minimise the risk of conflicts of
interest.
The creation of a subsidiary
‘not for profit’ Company RP is necessary for the
Company to hold sub-market rented homes that have received housing
grant from the GLA.
Alternative options considered
The formation of the Company was agreed by Cabinet
on 17 July 2018, with the detail being left for agreement at a
future meeting. Recommendations within this report reflect advice
from Pinsent Masons, the Council’s external legal advisors in
relation to the formation and running of the Company. The use of a
detailed Objectives clause was considered and discounted to ensure
that the Company could have scope to operate more freely in the
future. (An Objectives clause can limit trading of the company, for
instance to ‘owning and managing sub market rental
homes’, whereas the Council may in future want the Company to
be able to develop/own community projects which under such an
Objectives clause it would be unable to do).
The Articles of Association and Memorandum of
Understanding are clearly drafted to give the Council the assurance
that the Company will remain wholly owned and controlled by the
Council, less clearly draft documents may lead to confusion or
challenge in the future.
A wider range of director positions were considered
but discounted; for instance including the Monitoring Officer or
Chief Finance Officer (s151 Officer) or including external
directors. These options were discounted to ensure potential
conflicts of interest are avoided, to maximise the direct control
by the Council of the Company and to allow the Council and the
Company to operate in a proper and consistent manner.