The Cabinet Member for Housing and Estate Renewal
introduced the report, which sought approval for the Council to
carry out the conversion of the now vacant Adult Day Care Centre
and Kurdish Community Centre at Birkbeck Lodge into emergency accommodation
units.
In introducing the report, the Cabinet Member
highlighted the following issues:
·
The Council had a duty to house homeless families
where they found themselves in situations where they required
emergency accommodation.
·
Emergency accommodation was the most expensive form
of temporary accommodation provided by the Council and
often-involved expensive nightly rates being paid by the
Council.
·
Historically, there had been a heavy reliance on use
of B&B accommodation, which was often of poor
quality.
·
The Council was seeking to provide all emergency
accommodation within the borough in-house. There already existed
two converted properties for use as emergency accommodation
(Broadwater lodge, Whitehall
lodge).
·
This would be the third conversion of premises to
provide emergency accommodation to families in the borough and an
important new design feature was that all bedrooms would have an
en -suite bathroom. There would be no
shared bathroom facilities at the premises. All forms of future
emergency accommodation would take into account this new
requirement. There would still be communal areas, such as the
kitchens to allow as many units of accommodation as
possible.
- Homeless
families should only be in emergency accommodation for up to 12
weeks but the Cabinet Member recognised in certain circumstances,
this was longer. This period allowed the Council to assess whether
it had an obligation to provide housing duty for them.
- A lot of
emergency accommodation providers were not to a high standard and
could continue in this low quality model due a demand in their
services.
The Cabinet Member closed her introduction by
stating the impact on children who found themselves in emergency
accommodation could be immensely damaging and Cabinet should do all
it can to improve the quality of emergency
accommodation.
Following questions from Cllr Brabazon, Cllr Hearn,
Cllr Mark Blake and Cllr Cawley-Harrison, it was noted that:
- There would
be a member of staff on site 24/7. This was important as homeless
families might be vulnerable and support was necessary.
- The purpose
of the report was for a decision to be made to approve the capital
investment required for work on the conversion of Birkbeck Lodge into emergency accommodation, not to
release the revenue budget for managing it. The running cost budget
would be met from the housing benefit income of families at the
emergency accommodation and, because of the 24/7 support, extra
cover to the costs might be provided from some of the larger lodges
that have a better economy of scale. Savings on emergency
accommodation were highlighted at point 8.4 of the
report.
- Regarding
accessibility, all rooms were on the ground floor and would be step
free and wheelchair accessible.
- The creation
of Birkbeck Lodge will increase the
Haringey’s capacity to keep households within the borough
during the critical first few weeks.
- It was
considered appropriate to start looking across the portfolio of
properties owned by the Council to see where other premises could
be converted into emergency accommodation and, if possible, for
those to be fully self-contained. This was explored with
Birkbeck Lodge; however, given the lack
of emergency accommodation available at the time, this was not in
the final plan, as it would have reduced the number of rooms
available to homeless families.
-
The 24/7 provision of staffing at Birkbeck Lodge would not change despite the
available provision of CCTV, detailed in the report. Security of
the premise was paramount and it was important to provide staffing
and surveillance, especially where families were sharing communal
areas.
- The
accommodation would be appropriate for families, as far as
possible. Rooms were of different sizes, with a different number of
beds, and certain rooms could be joined to accommodate bigger
families if necessary. As the portfolio of the Council’s
emergency accommodation premises grows, it would be able to better
suit accommodation to homeless family’s needs. It was the
Council’s intention to house families in the most suitable
accommodation, where possible.
- There was no
intention to add sprinklers to the premise as this was not a
requirement by set regulations, and there could be a risk that they
may do more harm than good given that these emergency rooms would
be on the ground floor. However, the Homes for Haringey Managing
Director would seek advice from the
Fire Brigade and other authorities on this matter and write back to
Cllr Cawley- Harrison.
RESOLVED
- To
approve the conversion of the ground floor of 2-152 Birkbeck Road into temporary
accommodation.
- To
approve the Agreed Maximum Price (AMP) submitted by Engie Limited (Engie)
(formally Keepmoat Ltd) for the Birkbeck Lodge Temporary Accommodation Conversion
Works.
- To
approve the total professional fees of £62,951, which
represents 6.42% of the contract sum.
- To
note the total project costs of £1,043,495.
- To
authorise Haringey’s Legal Department to issue a letter of
intent for the amount of up to and not exceeding £98,054
being 10% of the contract sum under the Council’s Contract
Standing Orders (CSO) 9.07.3 allowing the planned work to start on
site as soon as possible.
Reasons
for decision
The Council uses emergency accommodation such as the
type proposed at Birkbeck Lodge to
house households who approach the Council as homeless, whilst Homes
for Haringey continue to work with the household to explore their
housing options. These additional bed spaces will reduce the need
to procure expensive and dispersed short-term housing to
accommodate households while their applications are being
assessed.
The reasons for recommendations 3.2 and 3.5 is to
enable the project to commence by issuing the letter of intent and,
pending conclusion of the formal contract, the award of the
contract to Engie.
Alternative options considered
The
option of doing nothing was rejected as this would leave the space
unused and risks squatting and/or falling into long-term
disrepair.
The
option of converting this space into permanent Council housing was
considered, but there is a pressing need for more emergency
accommodation in-borough for households who approach the Council as
homeless. The proposed conversion would not prevent the Council
from converting the space it permanent Council housing in the
future.