RECEIVED the Council’s
Quarterly Performance Assessment report for quarter 2, 2011/2012
(pages 1 – 27 of the agenda pack) introduced by Margaret
Gallagher (Policy Team Manager), Eve Pelekanos (Head of Policy,
Intelligence and Partnership) and Helena Pugh (Strategic
Partnership Manager). The Committee
also received the tabled document summarising the borough’s
priorities/ outcomes framework agreed in the Sustainable Community
Strategy and the 2010/11 Council Plan.
In response to questions and
discussions the following was noted:
- Members questioned
the absence of performance data on young people’s sexual
health and obesity and it was noted that this information was
reported on an annual basis.
- It was explained that
performance reports focussed on specific areas of concern but this
did not mean that other areas were not being monitored.
- The Committee asked
for performance information on housing voids to be included in
future reports.
- A briefing session on
the impact of the Localism Bill would be held for council
members.
- In response to
comments about the Council making use of external funding it was
reported that often bids for funding required match-funding or
resources which the Council could not supply therefore the Council
prioritised the funds it applied for.
- A Committee member
suggested revisiting the issue of youth club provision in response
to youth and gang violence.
- It was reported that
whilst English GCSE results were below the English GCSE
Baccalaureate (a new measure of achievement) this particular
indicator was not currently a priority for headteachers who were
focusing on driving up the results in the other 5 important
subjects and vocational areas for child attainment
purposes. Headteachers’
priorities may have to change if government and Ofsted judgements
were based on the English Baccalaureate in future.
- It was reported that
the time for processing housing benefit claims slowed in the second
quarter due to the increase in demand and the effect of the current
economic situation but this was still indicated by a green traffic
light indicator as figures were based on trends.
- In response to
concerns at the lack of data from the health service it was noted
that the Council had only received quarter 1 figures and health
partners had agreed to provide more accurate date in the
future.
RESOLVED that the report be
noted and the following actions be delegated to the appropriate
directorate/ officers:
- The Committee
requested a briefing note on the implications of the Localism Bill
on Haringey and details of any local authorities that have piloted
the use of the powers and freedoms prescribed by the Bill. It was
suggested that officers provide presentations for local residents
at Area Committee meetings. (Action
65.1)
- The Committee agreed
that Housing Voids were an important performance indicator and
should be reported in all performance monitoring
reports. (Action
65.2)
- The Committee would
be sent the terms of reference of the Strategic Partnership’s
review of social inclusion and worklessness. (Action
65.3)
- A briefing explaining
the concept and legal aspects of academies would be circulated to
the Committee. (Action 65.4)
- Paragraph 66 (page 20
of the agenda pack) – The Committee would be circulated more
information on the new funding streams for community-led projects
(‘Community First’ and the ‘Big Local
Trust’). The funds would go directly to the voluntary sector
and not be paid through the Council. (Action
65.5)
- Paragraph 69 (page
21) – performance of the benefit service – the
Committee requested more information about customer satisfaction
and how the department was responding to the length of time taken
to process claims. (Action 65.6)
- The Committee
requested an update on the redevelopment of Tottenham Hotspur
Football Club and the role the Club will play in the regeneration
of Tottenham. (Action 65.7)
- Committee Members
expressed that they felt a clear policy was needed for Council
owned property and asked for details on the benefits of using such
property for regeneration projects as well as details of the
current property review which was taking place. (Action
65.8)
- The Committee
requested more information about the Council’s strategies for
dealing with temporary accommodation. (Action
65.9)
- /Information on the
performance outcomes framework will be circulated to the
Committee. (Action
65.10)
- The Committee
expressed concerns about whether children were picked-up by the
system if they were not having vaccinations. Figures on the take-up of vaccinations would be
circulated. (Action 65.11)
- Trend arrows will be
incorporated into future Performance Reports. (Action
65.12)
- Re the
previous Breast Screening Scrutiny Review – the Committee
asked for an update on how the recommendations had been implemented
by the health service. (Action 65.13)