RECEIVED the report on the Analysis of Fixed
Term and Permanent Exclusions – Academic Year 2008/9 and
Academic Year 2009/10, introduced by the Deputy Director –
Children’s Network and Avi Becker (Business Intelligence
Manager).
The Committee welcomed Martin Tissot, Headteacher of St Thomas More School, which
had a high number of exclusions during 2009/10 in comparison to
other schools and noted the responses to advance questions on the
report. A discussion followed.
NOTED
- In response to an
urgent matter raised by Cllr Allison in relation to a child
protection case it was agreed that the Director of Children’s
Services would circulate a legal briefing to the Committee and Cllr
Allison detailing how sensitive child protection information was
shared on a “need to know basis” (Action No.
250.1).
- The Committee
requested that in future the exclusions data be analysed by the
nature of the offences committed (Action No. 250.1).
- Members suggested that best practice
in dealing with exclusions in schools be streamlined across all
schools and were informed that, although schools had to comply with
national guidance, each school set its own boundaries for behaviour
and consequences of poor behaviour. The
local authority provided head teachers with the forums to come
together to discuss good practice and advise schools on how other
schools have dealt with similar incidents.
- The Headteacher of St Thomas More
School explained that a school’s Governing Body determined
the school’s behaviour policy/exclusions policy although the
head teacher had the ultimate responsibility. A school’s governing body could overturn a
head teacher’s decision to exclude a pupil, particularly if
national guidance had not been followed. Some schools might not exclude a child for
fighting but if a child was found to be the perpetrator of a fight
more than once at St Thomas More School they would be
excluded.
- In response to concerns raised by
the Committee officers recognised that there was an issue around
the high proportion of children from ethnic groups being excluded
from school and highlighted that these groups were also over
represented in other areas such as youth crime. There was a general consensus that more work with
these groups was required and that those children who failed at
school were likely to be part of statistics for youth crime and
such other areas in the future as well has having a budgetary
impact as children not in education, employment or training
(NEET).
- The academic impact of exclusions on
pupils was recognised but Members were reminded that schools had a
duty to protect the other children in schools from harm and
distraction from learning. Excluded children attended pupil
referral units as soon as possible during exclusions.
- Mr Tissot explained that his school worked on trying
to avoid exclusions through mentoring and managed moves to other
schools. He explained that he had recently taken over as head
teacher at the school and there had been a high number of
exclusions in the autumn term as new expectations of behaviour were
being set. The numbers of exclusions
were expected to reduce rapidly in the current term.
- The Committee noted that the Council
tracked children in other boroughs who had previously been excluded
from schools in Haringey and children in care who and those with
statements who were likely to experience difficulties in
schools. The Council worked closely
with these children putting plans in place to ensure that they
attended and remained in school.
RESOLVED to note the
report.