Agenda and minutes

Please note that this meeting may be filmed or recorded by the Council for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s internet site or by anyone attending the meeting using any communication method. Although we ask members of the public recording, filming or reporting on the meeting not to include the public seating areas, members of the public attending the meeting should be aware that we cannot guarantee that they will not be filmed or recorded by others attending the meeting. Members of the public participating in the meeting (e.g. making deputations, asking questions, making oral protests) should be aware that they are likely to be filmed, recorded or reported on. 

By entering the meeting room and using the public seating area, you are consenting to being filmed and to the possible use of those images and sound recordings.

The chair of the meeting has the discretion to terminate or suspend filming or recording, if in his or her opinion continuation of the filming, recording or reporting would disrupt or prejudice the proceedings, infringe the rights of any individual or may lead to the breach of a legal obligation by the Council.

The Chair referred to the filming at meetings notice, and attendees noted this information.

RESOLVED:

To note the filming procedure

To receive any apologies for absence.

There were none.

The Chair will consider the admission of any late items of Urgent Business. (Late items of Urgent Business will be considered under the agenda item where they appear. New items of Urgent Business will be dealt with under Item 22 below. New items of exempt business will be dealt with at Item 29 below).

There were 2 items of  late exempt business in relation to items 28 and 29. These items were not available at the time of the publication due to the need for additional verification and consultation on this information before decision making at Cabinet. Cabinet accepted these reports as late business in accordance with Part four section C paragraph 3.3 of the Constitution.

A Member with a disclosable pecuniary interest or a prejudicial interest in a matter who attends a meeting of the authority at which the matter is considered:

(i) must disclose the interest at the start of the meeting or when the interest becomes apparent, and

(ii) may not participate in any discussion or vote on the matter and must withdraw from the meeting room.

A Member who discloses at a meeting a disclosable pecuniary interest which is not registered in the Register of Members’ Interests or the subject of a pending notification must notify the Monitoring Officer of the interest within 28 days of the disclosure.

Disclosable pecuniary interests, personal interests and prejudicial interests are defined at Paragraphs 5-7 and Appendix A of the Members’ Code of Conduct.

There were none.

On occasions part of the Cabinet meeting will be held in private and will not be open to the public if an item is being considered that is likely to lead to the disclosure of exempt or confidential information. In accordance with the Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012 (the “Regulations”), members of the public can make representations about why that part of the meeting should be open to the public.

This agenda contains exempt items as set out at Item 23: Exclusion of the Press and Public. No representations with regard to these have been received.

This is the formal five clear day notice under the Regulations to confirm that this Cabinet meeting will be partly held in private for the reasons set out in this Agenda.

There were no representations received in relation to the exempt items.

To confirm and sign the minutes of the meeting held on 22 April 2025 as a correct record.

The minutes of the previous meeting, dated 22 April 2025, were discussed

RESOLVED:

The minutes of the previous meeting, dated 22 April 2025, were approved as a true and accurate record of proceedings.

To consider any requests received in accordance with Standing Orders.

There were none.

For Cabinet to note (if any).

There were none.

Report of the Corporate Director of Children's Services (Statutory DCS). To be presented by the Cabinet Member for Children, Schools & Families

The Lead Member for Children, Schools and Families introduced the report. It was explained that Haringey’s Youth Strategy aimed to recognise that the delivery of a youth offer was not the responsibility of a single agency but was owned by all partners that worked with young people in the borough. It was stressed that the approach was underpinned by a strong vision that collaboration and partnership was at the heart of what the Council did to ensure young people received the support they needed to succeed and improve outcomes.

It was explained that the strategy focused on ensuring that there was a local youth offer that was needs-led, inclusive, diverse, and supported young people to feel safe, learn new skills, and be actively supported and engaged in influencing decision-making on topics that were important to them. A key priority of the strategy was to develop a borough-wide approach across the youth sector to ensure that there was a co-ordinated, accessible youth offer that provided high-quality spaces and activities for young people, offering opportunities that benefited them in their lives as they transitioned to adulthood.

Youth representatives gave an account of their input into the development of the strategy. It was explained that young people felt that the strategy was inclusive and open for young people, but that there could be a better structure and awareness of the impact that young people can have on the youth strategy and outcomes for young people. Young people did note that the survey had some limited impact in schools, due to lack of interest in schools and teaching staff. It was noted that young people often didn’t see an outcome from work that was undertaken by the local authority and that this could be an area in which the Council worked in future.

In response to comments and questions from Councillors Chandwani, Carlin, Hakata and Emery the following information was shared:

• Young people suggested that there should be more outreach on social media to outline the impact that young people can have on their community and how they can also impact the work of the Council.
  
  
• Young people stressed the need to build long-term relationships with young people in the community to help build networks and connections and therefore increase participation.
  
  
• Officers outlined the success criteria of the plan. It was explained that engagement with young people was a key identifier of success. However, it was stressed that there were some difficulties in reaching young people, but noted that there had been some success in this area in the development of the strategy. It was noted that the Council would work with schools to encourage more proactivity with the strategy’s aims.
  
  
• Officers explained that the prioritising of spending recommendations within the strategy were not yet known, and that the Council would provide future evidence of the prioritisation of resources. However, officers stressed that they would encourage young people to challenge the work of the Council.
  
  
• Officers explained that Haringey had produced their strategy  ...  view the full minutes text for item 208.

Report of the Corporate Director of Culture, Strategy and Communities. To be presented by the Cabinet Member for Placemaking & Local Economy

The Cabinet Member for Placemaking and Local Economy introduced the report. It was explained that, for those who were not in employment but wanted to work, accessing the labour market and securing good work was a challenge for a number of reasons, not least the systemic barriers in place to finding and keeping sustainable, well-paid employment. It was explained that Haringey Council pledged to support people into good jobs where they were paid a regular fair wage and had opportunities to progress. People with illnesses – physical and mental – and those living with disabilities faced additional barriers to finding employment and could benefit from tailored support.

It was explained that the Council had accepted the £3.8 million Connect to Work grant to fund the work of Haringey Works over the following five years to support almost 1,000 people into good jobs. This was a voluntary scheme for people who wanted tailored support from the Council. Haringey Works had a proven track record, using a person-centred holistic approach to ensure wider barriers to employment were addressed. In 2024/25, 450 of the residents they supported moved into employment within the year across a variety of sectors.

It was noted that the Council had built on its approach by integrating employment, health, and community services to provide individual support to people with disabilities, health conditions, and complex barriers to finding sustainable employment. It not only addressed individual barriers but also systemic ones in various employment sectors, bringing diverse perspectives and experiences into our labour market.

It was explained that Haringey had the sixth highest unemployment rate in London; this figure represented people without jobs who were actively seeking work and that there was a role for the Council to play in supporting this group. It was stressed that good employment brought economic, social, and psychological benefits to people and that it was a key part of the Council’s commitment to make Haringey a place where people could thrive.

In response to comments and questions from Cllr Emery, the following information was shared:

• It was explained that Haringey had chosen a model of a 50/50 split between commissioned services and in house services and that this would allow the Council to most effectively undertake the requirements of the service and to also develop its in house offer.
  
  
• It was noted that the Council had worked with around 450 people, and that these were a wide a range of residents, focussing on the areas of highest unemployment in the borough. It was stressed that, while the service targeted key areas, it would work to support all of those currently seeking work within the borough.
  
  
• It was explained that the service provided bespoke support to those who were struggling most to get into work, particularly those with complex needs.
  
  

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet:

1. Approved acceptance of a grant from Central London Forward of £3,834,041 for the delivery of 50% of the Connect to Work programme in Haringey between April 2025 and March 2030. This would create  ...  view the full minutes text for item 209.

Report of the Corporate Director of Environment and Resident Experience. To be presented by the Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment & Transport

The Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment and Transport introduced the report. It was explained that the solar PV maintenance contract sat at the heart of the borough-wide push for climate resilience and renewable energy and that, from the initial 37 systems installed to the 46 more recent systems in housing developments, the Council had built an impressive network capable of generating clean electricity across its estates. It was highlighted that the borough’s council house building programme was about delivering high-quality, comfortable homes, designed to reduce carbon emissions and household bills and that on-site renewables, like solar panels, came as standard.

It was explained that the proposed contract marked a critical turning point in the Council’s approach and that these systems generated maximum renewable energy, directly reducing the borough’s carbon footprint; provided crucial data for the Annual Carbon Report; extended their operational life well beyond the expected 25 years; and, reduced energy costs for residents, schools, and services.

It was explained that the proposed flexible contract structure meant the Council was prepared for growth and that the core systems received immediate attention while the framework allowed schools, housing developments, and community buildings to join when ready. It was stressed that the journey toward carbon neutrality required investment and careful stewardship of existing assets and that the proposed contract delivered the latter, looking to transform how the Council protected and optimised the renewable infrastructure already built across Haringey.

It was explained that the proposed maintenance programme showed recognition that caring for existing assets formed an essential part of responsible climate leadership. The existing solar network had to work at peak performance if the Council was serious about delivering its zero-carbon commitments to Haringey residents.

In response to comments and questions from Cllr Emery, the following information was shared:

• It was explained by officers that the development, design and procurement of new PV systems would take significant amounts of time, so any additional funding from central government would be unlikely to be needed through this contract. It was stressed that the contract did have the flexibility to be able to add new systems as needed.
  
  

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet:

1. Pursuant to the Council’s Contract Standing Order (CSO) 8.01 (use of Council Dynamic Purchasing System) and CSO 2.01.1C (Cabinet approval required for contracts valued at £500,000 or more), approved the award of a Solar Photovoltaic (PV) maintenance, metering, and monitoring contract to Contractor A (identified in Part B exempt section of the report). The contract was for an initial period of two years from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2027, with an option to extend by one year to 30 June 2028 and a further option to 30 June 2029, with the total contract value identified in the Part B exempt report.

Reasons for Decision

The Council had its own established DPS, the LCP DPS, which was the preferred DPS for works. The tender was run as a mini competition via the DPS and was open from 17 March to 10 April 2025.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 210.

Report of the Corporate Director of Adults, Housing and Health. To be presented by Cabinet Member for Housing & Planning (Deputy Leader)

The Cabinet Member for Housing and Planning, and Deputy Leader of the Council introduced the report. It was explained that the Council had invested in the refurbishment of thousands of council homes across Haringey and that the proposal was to commit more than £0.5bn to refurbishments over the following ten years. This aimed to bring 100% of council homes in Haringey to the Decent Homes Standard by 2028. The proposal would improve the average council home’s energy rating from C-grade to B-grade, cutting bills for thousands of residents. That meant double glazing was installed, new modern boilers fitted, wall and loft insulation added, new front and back doors installed, as well as other measures.

It was explained that the Council was working to transform the way it procured building services and that, instead of managing many small contracts, it agreed to a few large contracts, one for each quarter of the borough.It was stressed that the Council closely monitored the performance of those firms, ensuring they consistently delivered quality. It was explained that this approach also enabled greater resident involvement in decision-making, both in procurement and governance. When designing repairs or refurbishments for a series of homes or an entire building, there was a real opportunity to collaborate with residents through regular engagement and the Resident’s Voice Board. This requirement was written into the contracts.

The Cabinet Member explained that the scale and duration of these contracts allowed the Council to create jobs and opportunities for local people. Social value was maximised in the contracts. The Council aimed to see local jobs created, apprenticeships offered, and investment directed into the local community. These expectations were also embedded in the contracts. This agreement embedded a long-term partnership with the appointed firms, bringing investment not just in bricks and mortar but also in communities across the borough.

In response to comments and questions from Cllr Emery, the following information was shared:

• The Council had a proportion of Council Houses that met decent home standard at 80%. It was also explained that officers would respond in writing to questions on number of buildings at EPC B+
  
  
• It was explained that scores for any successful bidder were required to be above 81.34% in the tender evaluation process.

.

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet:

1. Approved the award of the four partnering contracts across four geographical Lots, to four separate successful bidders in accordance with CSO 2.01(C).
   
   
2. Approved delegated authority for the Director of Housing, in consultation with the Corporate Director of Finance and Resources, to issue works orders under the contract in line with the annually Cabinet-approved Housing Revenue Account Housing Capital Programme.

Reasons for Decision

Haringey Council owned and managed approximately 20,500 properties within the London Borough of Haringey.

The award of the four contracts supported the strategy approved by Cabinet in July 2022—Partnering Contracts Strategy for Housing Major Works—and established four long-term partnering contracts. These were identified as the best way to address decency issues through a holistic approach to refurbishing both tenanted  ...  view the full minutes text for item 211.

Report of the Corporate Director of Environment and Resident Experience. To be presented by Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment & Transport

The Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment and Transport introduced the report. It was explained that the Bruce Grove West Green Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) had delivered significant safety improvements since its implementation, noting that the December 2024 Cabinet report showed that road traffic collisions had halved across the area. However, the Council recognised that the unique geography of Broadwater Farm (BWF) created particular challenges for residents. Located centrally within the borough’s largest LTN and with some of the lowest public transport accessibility levels in Haringey, Broadwater Farm residents faced longer diversionary routes than most when accessing services to the south via Philip Lane.

It was explained that this targeted proposal addressed equity concerns while preserving the environmental and safety benefits that LTNs delivered for communities. With only 41% of Broadwater Farm households on average owning cars—below the borough average—this measured exemption was designed to benefit those who needed it most without undermining traffic reduction objectives. The proposal ensured that this “LTN within an LTN” did not inadvertently disadvantage residents who relied on private vehicles for essential journeys, while maintaining the integrity of the wider network that had made streets safer for everyone.

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet:

1. Approved, subject to statutory (traffic order) consultation:
   a) Changes to the existing traffic filter in Gloucester Road as set out in Appendix A.
   b) Introduction of a new Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) exemption allowing residents of Broadwater Farm to apply for one permit entitling them to drive a single motor vehicle (of which they were the registered keeper) through the traffic filter defined in 3.1(a).
   
   
2. Approved the commencement of statutory (traffic order) consultation associated with the recommendations in 3.1, in accordance with The Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996 (the “Regulations”), with consultation to begin only after the conclusion of the call-in period following this decision.
   
   
3. Delegated authority to the Corporate Director of Environment and Resident Experience, following consultation with the Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment and Transport, and subject to key decisions being considered by Cabinet, to:
   a) Consider any objections arising from the statutory (traffic order) consultation and decide whether to make the associated traffic order(s).
   b) Approve the amendment to the LTN exemption criteria, taking into account any objections arising from the consultation.

Reasons for Decision

The reasons for the recommendations were set out in detail in Section 6 of the report.

Alternative Options Considered

Do nothing:
This option would have retained the current status quo, whereby most motorists living on Broadwater Farm accessed their homes via roads leading to and from Lordship Lane or Bruce Grove. Due to the current location of traffic filters—mainly to the south of Broadwater Farm—most residents could not directly access their homes via Philip Lane. This option was considered and discounted.

Remove the Gloucester Road traffic filter:
This option would have enabled Broadwater Farm residents to access Philip Lane by motor vehicle. However, it would have created a “leaky” LTN, allowing any motorist to drive through, thereby undermining one of  ...  view the full minutes text for item 212.

Report of the Corporate Director of Culture, Strategy and Communities. To be presented by Cabinet Member for Housing & Planning (Deputy Leader)

The Cabinet Member for Housing and Planning, and Deputy Leader of the Council introduced the report. It was explained that the Council had invested in refurbishing and renewing its council homes which was part of its ambition to improve the quality of homes for residents across the borough. A significant programme of investment was underway on Broadwater Farm, and this package of works continued the Council’s commitment to upgrading existing homes alongside the new build programme that was set to deliver almost 300 new homes on the estate.

It was explained that this investment funded new communal flooring for eight blocks, waterproofing of existing balconies, upgrades to essential pipework, repairs to areas of aged, flaking concrete, and external redecoration. It followed a recent programme of fire safety upgrades, which concluded earlier in the year. It was noted that residents were heavily involved in designing the work and contributed to decisions around floor covering finishes and colours. These changes enhanced the communal areas and the external appearance of the blocks—giving the estate a fresh new look

In response to comments and questions from Cllr Gordon, the following information was shared:

• Cabinet Members welcomed the work on Broadwater Farm improvement and the estate renewal. It was additionally noted that the Council was working to address issues of overcrowding in the borough and that there was ongoing improvement work undertaken by the Council on existing sites.
  
  
• It was explained that the development on blocks was selected based on location, proximity to each other and ease of access to the blocks for work to be undertaken.
  
  
• It was explained that leaseholders would be required to make payments for  improvements made on blocks as part of maintenance fees. It was explained that Haringey had a generous repayment programme and would be repayable over a flexible period.
  
  

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet:

1. Pursuant to Contract Standing Order (CSO) 2.01.c (Cabinet approval required for contracts valued at £500,000 or more), approved the award of contract to Tenderer A (as set out in Appendix A), to a total value of £3,555,921.59.
   
   
2. In consultation with the Director of Finance, approved the expenditure of sums set out in the exempt part of the report.
   
   
3. Approved the issuance of a letter of intent for the value of £350,000.00. The Letter of Intent allowed the contractor to commence the project by placing orders with their supply chain before a formal contract was agreed.

Reasons for Decision

The refurbishment of the Broadwater Farm Estate included upgrades and improvements to 10 blocks on the estate. The refurbishment involved structural strengthening to provide increased stability to the large panel system (LPS) blocks. Window replacements for all units were included, along with the replacement of existing external wall insulation. New front entrance doors and communal fire doors, landscaping, drainage repairs, and other essential external and communal works were also carried out.

The programme was noted as complex in terms of design, delivery, programming, and budget. As a result, two blocks—Rochford and Martlesham—were identified as pilot installations. These blocks  ...  view the full minutes text for item 213.

Report of the Corporate Director of Environment and Resident Experience. To be presented by the Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment & Transport

The Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment and Transport introduced the report. It was explained that School Streets helped boost children’s physical activity and that, by making streets traffic-free at school opening and closing times, the Council created safer, cleaner, more welcoming spaces that encouraged walking, cycling, and scooting. It was explained that one of the main barriers preventing children from being active was road danger. Parents drove their children to school because they did not feel the streets were safe for walking or cycling. School Streets created protected spaces where children could arrive at school actively, building crucial patterns of daily exercise they would carry through life.

It was additionally noted that School Streets were about more than managing traffic - they were about reimagining what kind of borough Haringey aspired to be, a fairer, greener Haringey meant streets designed for people, especially the youngest residents. The three schools in this report, St Francis de Sales RC Infant and Junior Schools, Bounds Green Infant and Junior Schools, and Welbourne Primary School, joined over 40 other schools already benefiting from School Streets, with more to come as part of the Council’s ambitious plan.

It was explained that, in Haringey, the choice was to be a borough where every child could walk, cycle, or scoot to school safely, where the school run strengthened rather than threatened community wellbeing, and where physical activity was woven into the fabric of daily life.

In response to comments and questions from Cllrs Arkell, Chandwani and Emery, the following information was shared:

• It was explained by officers that, on all School Streets the Council implement, enhanced monitoring would be undertaken to understand and access the impact. It was stressed that views of residents would be taken into account in the implementation on School Streets.
  
  
• It was asked about the management of traffic onto adjacent roads. Officers explained that they would monitor School Streets to ensure the effectiveness of the School Street and review the School Street location based on the site of the school, as well as ensure good levels of enforcement on adjacent roads. It was noted that dispersal data would be shared with Cabinet Members.
  
  

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet:

1. Considered all feedback, including objections to the proposed permanent traffic management orders, as set out in Appendix A, together with the feedback themes and responses to objections as set out in Appendix G.
   
   
2. Agreed that the Council would exercise its discretion not to cause a public inquiry to be held (see paragraph 6.34).
3. Approved that the following School Streets projects (as shown in Appendix B) be implemented:
   1. St Francis de Sales RC Infant and Junior Schools (SS15)
   2. Bounds Green Infant and Junior Schools (SS48)
   3. Welbourne Primary School, Stainby Road entrance (SS54)
      
      
4. Authorised the Head of Highways and Parking to make all necessary traffic management orders (TMOs) and install/undertake all necessary highway infrastructure and works required to give effect to the School Street designs set out in Appendix B of the report.

Reasons for Decision

School Streets  ...  view the full minutes text for item 214.

Report of the Corporate Director of Finance and Resources (S151 Officer). To be presented by the Cabinet Member for Placemaking & Local Economy

The Cabinet Member for Placemaking and Local Economy introduced the report. It was explained that the Council owned a broad range of land and property assets, from corporate properties where staff provided services, to retail outlets, commercial units, and community spaces. These assets provided a valued source of income and social value to residents; however, they also incurred significant running and maintenance costs. As a corporate landlord, the Council had a responsibility to manage these assets to the highest standard on behalf of taxpayers and for the benefit of all residents.

It was noted by the Cabinet Member that, following an extensive review of its land and property assets, the Council found that a number were surplus to requirements. These properties were either costly to maintain, unsuitable for housing or service delivery, or lacked development potential.

This paper proposed to approve the Land and Property Disposal Policy, which set out a robust and transparent governance process. This policy strengthened the approach already taken in the Strategic Asset Management and Property Improvement Plan (SAMPIP), a key component of the Corporate Delivery Plan/ Having undertaken a detailed assessment of the properties listed for consideration in 2025–26, the Council sought permission to develop a business case for each asset ahead of its disposal.

It was explained that the policy and accompanying programme enabled the Council to better utilise, divest, and rationalise its property portfolio. This, in turn, freed up finances and resources to deliver on Council priorities.

In response to comments and questions from Cllr Emery, the following information was shared:

1. It was explained that the choice of assets were considered commercially sensitive and that the Council would not disclose this information publicly until tenders were available, in order to prevent market manipulation. However, officers assured Members that there had been a thorough review of properties undertaken by officers and relevant Boards to ensure robustness of decision making.
   
   

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet:

1. Approved the adoption of the Land and Property Disposal Policy shown at Appendix B.
   
   
2. Declared as surplus to requirements the land and property identified within the property disposal programme for the financial year 2025–26, as shown in EXEMPT Appendix A, and approved their disposal to support the Council’s income targets.
   
   
3. Delegated authority to the Corporate Director of Finance and Resources to dispose of any land and property identified within the property disposal programme for 2025–26 (as shown in EXEMPT Appendix A) for a capital receipt of £3 million or less, and to market the property, negotiate terms, approve the final terms of the disposal, and enter into the contract and any associated documentation, subject to achieving best consideration reasonably obtainable.
   
   
4. Authorised the Corporate Director of Finance and Resources to procure agent(s) to market the property.
   
   
5. Delegated authority to the Corporate Director of Finance and Resources, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Placemaking and Local Economy, to make minor amendments to the Land and Property Disposal Policy at Appendix B.
   
   
6. Noted: For land and property valued at more than £3 million, a  ...  view the full minutes text for item 215.

Report of the Corporate Director of Environment and Resident Experience. To be presented by the Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment & Transport

The Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment and Transport introduced the report. It was stressed that the global economic landscape had shifted dramatically since the Council first embarked on its journey to deliver strategic heat networks across Haringey and that the realities of the cost-of-living crisis, inflation, and uncertainties in global energy markets forced the Council to make difficult but necessary decisions. It was recognised that the Council’s financial responsibilities to residents required prudent management during these challenging times. It was explained that the decision to scale back the original ambition of becoming both a major infrastructure developer and energy provider demonstrated a commitment to responsible governance amid economic turbulence.

It was stressed that, throughout this process, the Council’s team built a formidable body of knowledge regarding district energy and heat networks. This expertise represented valuable intellectual capital for the borough. It was firmly believed that this knowledge should be harnessed and leveraged so that Haringey could maintain its position as a regional leader in decarbonisation, while also retaining influence over the borough’s energy future. This strategic repositioning presented an opportunity to explore a range of delivery models that could fulfil the Council’s climate ambitions without placing unsustainable financial burdens on its resources. The path forward required careful consideration of how to protect public assets while enabling crucial infrastructure development, position Haringey within the emerging regional heat network landscape, and respond effectively to government and GLA expectations—while safeguarding local interests. This was not merely a tactical retreat but a thoughtful recalibration of how the Council might achieve its goals through different means.

The Lead Member explained that the team committed to returning to Cabinet in the autumn 2025 with a clear set of options, enabling the administration to make informed decisions about the future direction of heat network delivery across the borough. This pause in the original strategy was not a retreat from climate ambitions, but rather a pragmatic recalibration in challenging circumstances

In response to comments and questions from Cllr Emery, the following information was shared:

• It was explained that the Council was in close discussions with the government on the decision, and stressed that the government was supportive in finding a collaborative solution to the issue. The Council was reviewing all options with the Greater London Authority and central government.
  
  
• It was noted by officers that there was a significant risk to Council of establishing a Council Funded Decentralised Energy Network, and that the proposals in the report sought to reduce this risk as much as possible, but delivering via another model.

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet:

1. Agreed that the Council would no longer work to deliver the strategic heat network projects as originally envisaged in the approved Outline Business Cases (OBCs) and agreed in December 2021 (Cabinet report entitled “Decentralised Energy Networks (DEN) Outline Business Case (OBC)”). Specifically, this meant the Council undertook no further work on delivering an energy company to construct and manage heat networks in an Energy Services Company (ESCO), nor on developing a  ...  view the full minutes text for item 216.

Report of the Corporate Director of Environment and Resident Experience. To be presented by the Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment & Transport

The Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment and Transport introduced the report. It was explained that the Council recognised the need to challenge the car-centric assumptions that had dominated cities for decades and embarked on a transformative journey toward more vibrant, equitable, and sustainable communities. It was explained that the vision was of streets that prioritised people over vehicles and that the Council envisioned public spaces that fostered social interaction and community cohesion, with ample green infrastructure to boost mental wellbeing and climate resilience. It imagined a transport network that offered genuine choice, connecting people to opportunities and services regardless of their background or ability.

It was explained by the Cabinet Member that, as the Council embarked on this journey, it recognised a unique opportunity to shape a future where urban mobility was synonymous with freedom, health, equity, and sustainability.

In response to comments and questions from Cllr Emery, the following information was shared:

• The Cabinet Member explained that the ambition of the programme was considered significant and the strategies of the Walking and Cycling Action Plan underpinned the development of this strategy. It was explained that the criteria for the development of projects within the plan’s scope depended on location, traffic flow, and impact.

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet:

1. Approved the Streets for People Investment Plan for the 2025/26 to 2029/30 financial years, as set out in Appendices 2, 3, and 4. This included a combination of SCIL funding and the carry forward of this funding. The Council also had LIP funding as part of the fourth iteration of the Local Implementation Plan (LIP4). It was noted that capital programmes for future years were under review and that the carry forward of resources from 2024/25 was subject to a separate decision when Cabinet considered the outturn report in July. This could have affected the overall level of investment.
   
   
2. Delegated decisions relating to scheme design to the Director of Resident Experience or the Head of Highways and Parking, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Climate Action, Environment, and Transport, subject to key decisions being considered by Cabinet. No decisions were to be taken by the Director of Resident Experience or the Head of Highways and Parking until after the conclusion of the call-in period following this decision.

3. Authorised the Head of Highways and Parking to:
   (a) Carry out any required consultation to deliver the schemes identified in the Streets for People Investment Plan for 2025/26; and, having had due regard to all consultation responses and considered whether a public inquiry should be held,
   (b) Make any necessary traffic management orders to give effect to the schemes in the 2025/26 financial year, subject to key decisions being considered by Cabinet and no decisions being taken until after the conclusion of the call-in period.

Reasons for Decision

The Streets for People Investment Plan set out the Council’s projects for the next five financial years and how they aligned with the Council’s strategic objectives. The plan added transparency and demonstrated how the Council aimed  ...  view the full minutes text for item 217.

Report of the Committees Manager. To be presented by the Committees Manager.

The Committees Manager introduced the report. It was explained that the report was an annual report which sought to re-establish the Cabinet sub-committees of the Corporate Parenting Advisory Committee and Community Safety Partnership, confirm its terms of reference, and appoint Members to serve on these Cabinet sub-Committees.

RESOLVED:

That Cabinet:

1.    To re-establish the Corporate Parenting Advisory Committee, and that the terms of reference for this advisory Sub Committee, attached at Appendix A be noted.

2.    To note the Community Safety Partnership terms of reference attached at Appendix B;

3.    To appoint the following Members to serve on the Corporate Parenting Advisory Committee and Community Safety Partnership:

            Corporate Parenting Advisory Committee

CHAIR:

Councillor Brabazon

MEMBERS:

            Councillors:

Opoku, Weston, Collett, Isilar-Gosling, Johnson and Ali

            Community Safety Partnership

Councillors:

            Ovat, Brabazon, da Costa

To note the delegated decisions taken by Directors.

The Significant and Delegated Actions were discussed.

RESOLVED:

The Significant and Delegated Actions were noted

To note the minutes of the following:

Cabinet Member Signings:

25 April 2025 - Request approval for receipt of grant from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local government (MCHLG) for Homelessness and Rough Sleeping Grant funding programmes 2025/26, Winter Pressures 2024

30 April 2025 - Civic Centre Tech Advisor & Broadwater Farm Northolt Strip-Out

1 May 2025 - Jansons Road – Approval of Housing Construction Contract

15 May 2025 - General Voids

21 May 2025 - Household Support Fund 2025/26

28 May 2025 - Canning Crescent 176 High Road, Wood Green, N22 8JT Refurbishment Works – Increase of project budget and variation of construction works contract. and Exempt Report

29 May 2025 - Approval to Commission Independent Fostering Agencies via a DPS and Approval to Commission Residential Children’s Homes Placements

The Minutes of Other Bodies were discussed.

RESOLVED:

The Minutes of Other Bodies were noted

There were none.

Note from the Committees Manager

Items 25,26,27,28,29 allow for consideration of exempt information in

relation to items 11,12,14, 16 and 17.

TO RESOLVE

That the press and public be excluded from the remainder of the meeting as items 24,25,26,27,28,29 contain exempt information as defined under paragraph 3, Part 1, Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972:

Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).

Information in respect of which a claim to legal professional privilege could be maintained in legal proceedings.

RESOLVED:

That the press and public be excluded from the remainder of the meeting as items 24,25,26,27,28,29 contain exempt information as defined under paragraph 3, Part 1, Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972

To confirm and sign the exempt minutes of the meeting held on x as a correct record.

The exempt minutes of the previous meeting, dated 22 April 2025, were discussed

RESOLVED:

The exempt minutes of the previous meeting, dated 22 April 2025, were approved as a true and accurate record of proceedings.

Relating to item 11

The exempt appendix was discussed.

RESOLVED:

The exempt appendix was noted.

Relating to item 12

The exempt appendix was discussed.

RESOLVED:

The exempt appendix was noted.

Relating to item 14

The exempt appendix was discussed.

RESOLVED:

The exempt appendix was noted.

Relating to item 16

Report to follow

The exempt appendix was discussed.

RESOLVED:

The exempt appendix was noted.

Relating to item 17

Report to follow

The exempt appendix was discussed.

RESOLVED:

The exempt appendix was noted.

As per item 3

There was none.