Agenda and minutes

Venue: Tottenham Green Leisure Centre, 1 Philip Lane, Tottenham N15 4JA

Contact: Fiona Rae, Principal Committee Co-ordinator  3541, Email: fiona.rae@haringey.gov.uk

Note: To watch the meeting, click the link on the agenda frontsheet 

Items
No. Item

1.

FILMING AT MEETINGS

Please note this meeting may be filmed or recorded by the Council for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s internet site or by anyone attending the meeting using any communication method.  Although we ask members of the public recording, filming or reporting on the meeting not to include the public seating areas, members of the public attending the meeting should be aware that we cannot guarantee that they will not be filmed or recorded by others attending the meeting.  Members of the public participating in the meeting (e.g. making deputations, asking questions, making oral protests) should be aware that they are likely to be filmed, recorded or reported on.  By entering the meeting room and using the public seating area, you are consenting to being filmed and to the possible use of those images and sound recordings.

 

The Chair of the meeting has the discretion to terminate or suspend filming or recording, if in his or her opinion continuation of the filming, recording or reporting would disrupt or prejudice the proceedings, infringe the rights of any individual, or may lead to the breach of a legal obligation by the Council.

Minutes:

The Chair referred to the notice of filming at meetings and this information was noted.

2.

PLANNING PROTOCOL

The Planning Committee abides by the Council’s Planning Protocol 2017.  A factsheet covering some of the key points within the protocol as well as some of the context for Haringey’s planning process is provided alongside the agenda pack available to the public at each meeting as well as on the Haringey Planning Committee webpage.

 

The planning system manages the use and development of land and buildings.  The overall aim of the system is to ensure a balance between enabling development to take place and conserving and protecting the environment and local amenities.  Planning can also help tackle climate change and overall seeks to create better public places for people to live, work and play.  It is important that the public understand that the committee makes planning decisions in this context.  These decisions are rarely simple and often involve balancing competing priorities.  Councillors and officers have a duty to ensure that the public are consulted, involved and where possible, understand the decisions being made.

 

Neither the number of objectors or supporters nor the extent of their opposition or support are of themselves material planning considerations.

 

The Planning Committee is held as a meeting in public and not a public meeting.  The right to speak from the floor is agreed beforehand in consultation with officers and the Chair.  Any interruptions from the public may mean that the Chamber needs to be cleared.

Minutes:

The Chair referred to the planning protocol and this information was noted.

3.

APOLOGIES

To receive any apologies for absence.

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Gina Adamou, Councillor Emine Ibrahim, and Councillor Liz Morris.

 

Councillor Julia Ogiehor was present as substitute for Councillor Liz Morris.

4.

URGENT BUSINESS

The Chair will consider the admission of any late items of urgent business. Late items will be considered under the agenda item where they appear. New items will be dealt with at item 14 below.

Minutes:

There were no items of urgent business.

5.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

A member with a disclosable pecuniary interest or a prejudicial interest in a matter who attends a meeting of the authority at which the matter is considered:

 

(i) must disclose the interest at the start of the meeting or when the interest becomes apparent, and

(ii) may not participate in any discussion or vote on the matter and must withdraw from the meeting room.

 

A member who discloses at a meeting a disclosable pecuniary interest which is not registered in the Register of Members’ Interests or the subject of a pending notification must notify the Monitoring Officer of the interest within 28 days of the disclosure.

 

Disclosable pecuniary interests, personal interests and prejudicial interests are defined at Paragraphs 5-7 and Appendix A of the Members’ Code of Conduct

Minutes:

Councillor Luke Cawley-Harrison noted that he would be speaking as a ward councillor in relation to item 8, HGY/2021/2718 - Stanhope Road Bridge, Stanhope Road, N6 5DE. He confirmed that he would not be taking part in the discussion or voting on this item and would leave the room after his submission, whilst the application was being discussed.

6.

MINUTES pdf icon PDF 182 KB

To confirm and sign the minutes of the Planning Sub Committee held on 1 November 2021 and 8 November 2021 as a correct record.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

RESOLVED

 

That the minutes of the Planning Sub-Committee held on 1 November 2021 and 8 November 2021 be confirmed and signed as a correct record.

7.

PLANNING APPLICATIONS

In accordance with the Sub Committee’s protocol for hearing representations; when the recommendation is to grant planning permission, two objectors may be given up to 6 minutes (divided between them) to make representations. Where the recommendation is to refuse planning permission, the applicant and supporters will be allowed to address the Committee. For items considered previously by the Committee and deferred, where the recommendation is to grant permission, one objector may be given up to 3 minutes to make representations.

Minutes:

The Chair referred to the note on planning applications and this information was noted.

8.

HGY/2021/2718 - STANHOPE ROAD BRIDGE, STANHOPE ROAD, N6 5DE pdf icon PDF 2 MB

Proposal: Construction of a new footbridge with associated ramp, stepped access, and landscaping, involving demolition of the existing bridge.

 

Recommendation: GRANT

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Cllr Cawley-Harrison moved to the public seating area.

 

The Committee considered an application for the construction of a new footbridge with associated ramp, stepped access, and landscaping, involving demolition of the existing bridge.

 

Laurence Ackrill, Planning Officer, introduced the report and responded to questions from the Committee:

·         The Committee enquired about the heritage significance of the Victorian railway bridge. The Principal Conservation Officer explained that there were different levels of designation and that this structure had local, not national importance, and was a non-designated heritage asset. It was noted that the bridge had symbolic value but had been significantly altered over time and had lost some of its character. It was also noted that the bridge needed to be used regularly by a number of users and that the retention of the existing bridge would have serious health and safety implications. It was highlighted that the most important heritage asset for the site was the conservation area, which was a nationally designated heritage asset, and that the loss of the bridge would secure better and safer use of the conservation area.

·         In relation to the location of the ramp, it was noted that seven additional areas had been considered. It was explained that the slope and topography of Stanhope Road meant that it was not considered viable to locate the ramp in the northwest corner of the site. It was added that the applicant might be able to provide further information about this process.

 

Cathy Meeus spoke in objection to the application. She stated that she did not object to the replacement of the bridge but was objecting to the loss of green space, the location of the ramp, and the significant destruction of trees and vegetation. It was noted that the Friends of the Parkland Walk challenged the use of this location for new entrance infrastructure, particularly in the context of climate change and biodiversity policies. It was stated that the council had failed to review alternative access options and had not provided these options as part of the consultations with other groups, including wheelchair users. Cathy Meeus added that the Friends of the Parkland Walk position had been supported in a petition signed by 450 people. It was suggested that the accesses at Holmesdale Road, Blythwood Road, and Oxford Road could be upgraded and would provide better accessible entrance options. It was also proposed that a long access path could be included on the southwest of the site, with wheelchair access provided elsewhere.

 

Cathy Meeus commented that the experts involved in judging the suitability of the proposal were part of the council or the applicant team and were not independent. It was also stated that the Planning Sub Committee had visited the site but it was felt that objectors should have been present to provide an alternative view. It was added that the proposals were considered to be in conflict with several key policies and that planting replacement trees offsite did not address the loss of  ...  view the full minutes text for item 8.

9.

HGY/2020/3186 - UNIT 7, UNICORN WORKS, 21-25 GARMAN ROAD, N17 0UN pdf icon PDF 933 KB

Proposal: Erection of two-storey replacement light industrial unit.

 

Recommendation: GRANT

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee considered an application for the erection of two-storey replacement light industrial unit.

 

It was noted that there had been a final revision to the parking which had been included in the addendum that was circulated to the Committee and published online.

 

Tania Skelli, Planning Officer, introduced the report and responded to questions from the Committee:

·         It was noted that there were expected to be 18 employees across the units and it was enquired why 36 long stay cycle units were proposed. It was also noted that there appeared to be some discussion about parking and it was enquired how the number of parking spaces had been calculated. It was commented that, as the units would be separate, it was unlikely that the unit occupiers would be able to co-ordinate service deliveries.

·         The Head of Development Management explained that there had been a previous building on site and an established position so there had been a balance between the applicant’s expectation on floor space and modernising the standards and layout. The Transport Planning Officer noted that the existing parking arrangements were quite congested and that work had been undertaken with the applicant to agree on a layout that worked well and complied with the London Plan parking standards. It was explained that the proposal was to have three loading bays to respond to the needs of the development and two parking spaces.

·         In relation to parking, Mr Upadhyay, applicant, stated that he had occupied unit 3 on the site for 20 years. He noted that it had been possible to park four cars in front of the unit if required so there was potentially room for 12 parking spaces across the front of the units.

·         It was highlighted that the completion date for the section 106 legal agreement, noted in part 3 of the recommendations, should read 18/01/2022 rather than 18/01/2021.

·         The Head of Development Management stated that the recommendation was to grant planning permission, subject to conditions, the amended drawing, and the amendment of the date relating to the completion of the section 106 legal agreement from 2021 to 2022.

 

Following a vote, it was

 

RESOLVED

 

1.    To GRANT planning permission and that the Head of Development Management is authorised to issue the planning permission and impose conditions and informatives subject to the signing of a section 106 Legal Agreement providing for the obligation set out in the Heads of Terms below.

 

2.    That delegated authority be granted to the Head of Development Management or the Assistant Director Planning to make any alterations, additions or deletions to the recommended heads of terms and/or recommended conditions as set out in this report and to further delegate this power provided this authority shall be exercised in consultation with the Chair (or in their absence the Vice-Chair) of the Sub-Committee.

 

3.    That the section 106 legal agreement referred to in resolution (1) above is to be completed no later than 18/01/2022 or within such extended time as the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 9.

10.

PRE-APPLICATION BRIEFINGS

The following items are pre-application presentations to the Planning Sub-Committee and discussion of proposals.

 

Notwithstanding that this is a formal meeting of the Sub-Committee, no decision will be taken on the following items and any subsequent applications will be the subject of a report to a future meeting of the Sub-Committee in accordance with standard procedures.

 

The provisions of the Localism Act 2011 specifically provide that a Councillor should not be regarded as having a closed mind simply because they previously did or said something that, directly or indirectly, indicated what view they might take in relation to any particular matter.  Pre-application briefings provide the opportunity for Members to raise queries and identify any concerns about proposals.

 

The Members’ Code of Conduct and the Planning Protocol 2016 continue to apply for pre-application meeting proposals even though Members will not be exercising the statutory function of determining an application.  Members should nevertheless ensure that they are not seen to pre-determine or close their mind to any such proposal otherwise they will be precluded from participating in determining the application or leave any decision in which they have subsequently participated open to challenge.

Minutes:

The Chair referred to the note on pre-application briefings and this information was noted.

11.

PPA-2021-0022 - ASHLEY ROAD DEPOT, ASHLEY ROAD, LONDON, N17 9LZ pdf icon PDF 1 MB

Proposal: Demolition of buildings and redevelopment of the site to provide approx. 275 new dwellings (min. 50% for social rent) in buildings of between four and thirteen storeys, two commercial units, 41 car parking spaces, new pedestrian/cycle routes, landscaping and public realm improvements.

Minutes:

The Committee considered the pre-application briefing for the demolition of buildings and redevelopment of the site to provide approx. 275 new dwellings (min. 50% for social rent) in buildings of between four and thirteen storeys, two commercial units, 41 car parking spaces, new pedestrian/cycle routes, landscaping and public realm improvements.

 

Cllr Rice noted that the land in this case was owned by Haringey Council and enquired whether it was a conflict of interest for the case officer to be a member of Haringey Council staff. He stated that it would be better for the case to be presented by an external person. The Head of Development Management noted that the case officer would present the case and then the applicant team would deliver a 15 minute presentation on the application; this was an accepted position where the applicant was the council.

 

The applicant team and officers responded to questions from the Committee:

·         It was confirmed that pitched roofs were no longer proposed within the application.

·         It was noted that the site had a sunken petrol tank to service vehicles and it was enquired what measures would be taken to ensure that the land was uncontaminated. The applicant team noted that the previous owner had only recently vacated the site and that, after the proper studies had been undertaken, further information would be reported back to the Committee. It was added that there was provision in the cost plan for decontamination.

·         The applicant team explained that the existing wall around the north and west of the site would be taken down, except for some sections of the wall which would be retained in order to preserve existing trees. It was explained that this would create some new public realm to replace the existing, narrow, concrete path.

·         It was noted that the council owned the land and it was enquired whether 100% social housing could be provided. The applicant team stated that about 62.5% of the habitable rooms would provide social housing. It was explained that this scheme also provided larger, family, social housing units which met an important need in Haringey but that this made it more challenging to meet the required levels of financial viability.

·         In relation to amenity, it was enquired whether Down Lane Park would be counted towards the amenity in the application as a number of developments in the area had used the park in their amenity calculations. The applicant team explained that the proposal would meet the required standards for playspace on the site, including integrating play into the landscape, and it was important that the site worked well for the community. It was added that there was a desire for the residents to use and activate the park as well.

·         The applicant team confirmed that the relevant child density calculations had been undertaken and this would inform the play strategy. It was also clarified that the there were three, communal, amenity spaces which were located in areas A and B, as well as in  ...  view the full minutes text for item 11.

12.

UPDATE ON MAJOR PROPOSALS pdf icon PDF 179 KB

To advise of major proposals in the pipeline including those awaiting the issue of the decision notice following a committee resolution and subsequent signature of the section 106 agreement; applications submitted and awaiting determination; and proposals being discussed at the pre-application stage.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Cllr Ogiehor stated that a number of residents had expressed concerns about Cranwood House (HGY/2021/2727) in relation to the size of the proposal and its protrusion onto Muswell Hill Road. It was enquired whether these concerns had been taken into account in the amended proposals. The Head of Development Management stated that there had been no substantial amendments since the application had been submitted but that this would be a question for the applicant team. It was noted that the application was currently being assessed and was likely to be presented to the Planning Sub Committee in January.

 

RESOLVED

 

To note the report.

13.

APPLICATIONS DETERMINED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS pdf icon PDF 130 KB

To advise the Planning Committee of decisions on planning applications taken under delegated powers for the period 18 October 2021 to 19 November 2021.

Minutes:

There were no queries on the report. The Chair noted that any queries could be directed to the Head of Development Management.

 

RESOLVED

 

To note the report.

14.

NEW ITEMS OF URGENT BUSINESS

Minutes:

There were no items of urgent business.

15.

DATE OF NEXT MEETING

To note the date of the next meeting as 13 December 2021 (provisional).

Minutes:

It was noted that the date of the next meeting was 10 January 2022.