Venue: Civic Centre, High Road, Wood Green, N22 8LE. View directions
Contact: Ayshe Simsek
No. | Item |
---|---|
Appointment of the Chair The Chair of Corporate Parenting Committee and Chair of the Children’s Safeguarding Policy and Practice Committee had previously agreed , outside the meeting, that they would alternate the responsibility of Chair for the joint meetings . The Chair of the Corporate Parenting Committee is due to chair this meeting.
Minutes: Previously the joint committee had agreed that the role of Chair is alternated between the Chair of Corporate Parenting Advisory Committee and Chair of Children’s Safeguarding Policy and Practice Committee. Cllr Reith, Chair of the Corporate Parenting Advisory committee chaired this meeting. |
|
Apologies for Absence(If any) Minutes: Apologies were received from Cllr Solomon, Reece, Stewart and Watson.
Cllr Amin provided apologies for lateness.
|
|
Urgent Business The Chair will consider the admission of any late items of urgent business. (Late items will be considered under the agenda item where they appear. New items will be dealt with at Item 9 below. New items of exempt business will be dealt with at Item 11 below).
Minutes: There were no items of urgent business. |
|
Declarations of Interest A member with a personal interest in a matter who attends a meeting of the authority at which the matter is considered must disclose to that meeting the existence and nature of that interest at the commencement of that consideration, or when the interest becomes apparent.
A member with a personal interest in a matter also has a prejudicial interest in that matter if the interest is one which a member of the public with knowledge of the relevant facts would reasonably regard as so significant that it is likely to prejudice the member's judgment of the public interest and if this interest affects their financial position or the financial position of a person or body as described in paragraph 8 of the Code of Conduct and/or if it relates to the determining of any approval, consent, license, permission or registration in relation to them or any person or body described in paragraph 8 of the Code of Conduct.
Minutes: No declarations of interest were put forward. |
|
Deputations/Petitions/Questions To consider any requests received in accordance with Standing Orders.
Minutes: There no deputations, petitions or public questions for the joint committee to consider. |
|
Presentation about the Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub(MASH) PDF 83 KB The Assistant Director for Children and Families and the Assistant Director for Safeguarding will provide an overview of the Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub. The MASH is a multi-agency safeguarding hub, which brings together a variety of agencies into an integrated multi-agency team, where they can share intelligence on vulnerable children, families and adults. Haringey’s MASH build’s on the existing First Response Multi Agency Team which has been operating since May 2010. It co-locates Metropolitan Police, Health Colleagues and Social Workers, together with support from education, housing and adult services. MASH will enhance this service through the additional police intelligence, and the co-location of other agencies such as Child Abuse Investigation Team (CAIT) and adult safeguarding.
Minutes:
The Committee received a presentation from the Head of First Response about the newly established MASH (Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub). This team builds on the existing First Response Multi Agency Team (FRMAT) which had been operating since May 2010. It co-located the Metropolitan Police, health and social workers, together with support from education and housing. The MASH enhances this model through having additional police intelligence, and the co-location of other agencies such as adult safeguarding, probation and mental health. The MASH team are together in one secure location, working together to best ensure vulnerable children in the borough are identified and properly cared for and protected.
Haringey was one of only two boroughs in the country currently operating with the MASH. Confidentiality is paramount and in this co location partners are able discuss the referrals in a multi-agency meeting, instantly sharing information about the family and deciding on the course of action for the child/ young person and family. This information sharing process will also allow the team to analyse information and identify any trends/patterns to referrals. Tim Loughton MP visited the team recently and commended the team on how well they worked together and had also been impressed by how the team had followed up the cases which they had referred. Indeed extracts from recent Ofsted inspections compared to those in the past, demonstrated how far the service had come in improving the speed and quality of decisions being made to safeguard vulnerable children and young people. The early information sharing about a family in a multi-agency environment also aided identifying how to support families at an early stage. The multi agency discussion would enable the right package of services to be commissioned for the family or appropriate links made with services such as Children’s Centre. Early intervention with families was key to stopping children coming into care The committee asked about benchmark figures to better understand the performance of the MASH in comparison to other comparator boroughs. Other boroughs, apart from Devon, had yet to fully establish a MASH (Multi Agency safeguarding Hub) but this would change over time as more teams were compiled. The Children’s Service would then be able to look at how quickly Initial assessments and referrals were being completed in comparison to other boroughs with the MASH. In terms of a review of the performance of the team it was noted that a London Safeguarding board would monitor this. Members of the committee were also welcome to visit and see first hand the work of the team.
Members sought understanding on how information from different databases of partners was interpreted and shared, in particular mental health service files. It was noted that the MASH were able to access the front page of a mental health service referral which would provide them the necessary information on whether the client had children and enable them to understand the nature of the referral. The partner representative themselves would interpret the data from their own partner agency and ... view the full minutes text for item 25. |
|
Performance Management Data - Children and Families - February 2012 PDF 68 KB This report is an update of Children and Families key safeguarding and Looked After Children’s performance information at the end of February 2012. Additional documents:
Minutes:
Safeguarding performance data There was no significant reduction in the number of contacts and referrals to the safeguarding service during the month of February. The committee noted that the service was investigating the rate of referrals but to be aware that there would be genuine reasons for the contacts becoming referrals.
The service was reaching their targets for the completion of initial and core assessments. The independent member of the Safeguarding Policy and Practice Committee had completed recent audits for the committee and had not raised concerns regarding the quality of assessments.
The number of child protection cases held by Haringey was higher compared to comparator boroughs but the service were confident, upon investigation of the cases, that this number was correct. This also applied to the number of children on a child in need plan. Regular audits were completed on plans to check progress against their original objectives. The committee learned that when children were passed to the children in need team ,it was because there were universal community based services that could help manage the risks and issues identified in the plan.
Members sought understanding about the Safeguarding Service’s links with the newly restructured children’s centres which were working to a cluster model. It was noted that there was an allocated social worker to each cluster who would also have links to the MASH .Under four’s represented 41% of cases referred to the MASH and there was current discussion with the Head of Early Years about the high referral rate of children from this category and considering whether the assessments of under 4’s at children centres needed to be different to provide more placements for these children.
LAC Performance data
The Joint Committee continued to consider performance information relating to LAC in the month of February which had also been considered at the start of the week by the Corporate Parenting Committee.
|
|
Family Intervention Project The Committee will consider a presentation about the work of the Family Intervention project. Minutes: The committee received a presentation on the work of the Family Intervention project and noted that the project was part of the Children in Social Care team The project was established in Feb 2010 with external grant funding and was unique to other services provided by the Children and Social Care teams in that it was not solely working with the child but working with the family as a whole . The family perspective was taken forward in assessment process. The team working with the families came from a multi discipline backgrounds and used evidence based practice and intervention methods. They worked with highly complex families and had the aim of building on their strengths.
When looking at the issues faced by the family, they would consider how individuals in the family unit had contributed to the problems being faced by the family and assess how to support them. The work involved empowering the families to take control of the solutions that needed to take place to change their circumstances. Often the families had been subject to investigation by statutory agencies and had consequently developed a negative view of them. For the family to achieve their intended outcomes they would need accept this support from the outset and be willing to participate in an intensive programme. The work with the families was likely to last 2 years and changes take place incrementally.
The work with the families involved intensive support starting from 7.00am until 8.00pm at night over a long period of time and meant that support workers were only allocated 4-6 families. It began with 16-25 weeks of persistent outreach work. Support workers would usually undertook practical tasks with families, helped them build relationships, make use of a range of interventions, challenge poor behaviour/. Their overall aim was help build the capacity of the family to deal with issues and problems independently.
It was a hybrid service and community based but helping families deal with a range of services and partner agencies. Currently the project was undertaking a review and evaluation of their work over the last two years and check if the families had achieved their intended outcomes i.e. a supportive network. Also the Deputy Director for children and families would be examining the model of working that has been used to support the families and whether it could be expanded out in the children and young people’s service. Following questions to the project co-ordinator, committee members gained the following knowledge:
|
|
New Items of Urgent Business To consider any items admitted at item 2 above.
Minutes: There were no new items of urgent business to consider. |
|
Exclusion of the Press and Public That the press and public be excluded from the meeting for consideration from following items as they may contain exempt information as defined in Section 100a of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended by Section 12A of the Local Government Act 1985): paras 1 & 2: namely information relating to any individual, and information likely to reveal the identity of an individual.
|
|
New Items of Exempt Urgent Business(If Any) To consider any items admitted at item 2 above.
Minutes: There were no new items of exempt business to consider. |
|
Next Meeting Monday 29th October 2012 7.00pm – Provisional date and subject to member agreement when considering the Council Committee Calendar of meetings. Minutes: October 29th 2012 provisional - to be confirmed at council AGM. |