Venue: Civic Centre, High Road, Wood Green, N22 8LE. View directions
Contact: Ayshe Simsek 2929
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for absence (if any) Minutes: There were no apologies for absence put forward. |
|
Urgent Business The Chair will consider the admission of late items of urgent business. Late items will be considered under the agenda item they appear. New items will be dealt with at item 14&16 below. Minutes: There were no items of urgent business put forward. |
|
Declarations of interest A member with a personal interest in a matter who attends a meeting of the authority at which the matter is considered must disclose to that meeting the existence and nature of that interest at the commencement of that consideration, or when the consideration becomes apparent.
A member with a personal interest in a matter also has a prejudicial interest in that matter the interest is one which a member of the public with knowledge of the relevant facts would reasonably regard as so significant that it is likely to prejudice the member’ judgement of the public interest. Minutes: There were no declarations of interest put forward. |
|
To consider the minutes of the meeting held on 27th June 2013. Minutes: Reference was made to CPAC244, final paragraph, and it was agreed that the Health Team had put forward a business case for recruiting an additional nurse and not a doctor , as stated in the minutes ,to help with further improving the rate of assessments. Agreed that the minutes be amended accordingly. |
|
Minutes: Agreed that the particular the concerns put forward by Aspire about housing issues being faced by care leavers and young parents who are being given poor quality housing are taken forward. It was agreed to Invite Denise Gandy to the next meeting with Aspire in December. The Head of Children in Care was aware of the issues being faced by care leavers and there was ongoing work with housing to procure a better quality standard of semi independent accommodation . Getting better quality housing for young care leavers that are parents was a priority and a meeting was booked with Legal services and Housing to look at how the issues for young parents can be addressed . The Committee were assured that there was a co-operative relationship with Housing. There was also report due to the next CPAC meeting on the 19th December on the Housing of care leavers which would provide information in response to Committee Member’s concerns. |
|
Performance Management : children and families PDF 138 KB This report sets out performance data and trends for an agreed set of measures relating to looked after children. Section 2 provides an overall assessment of performance in the service and performance highlights. Appendix 1 provides a series of tables and graphs for each of these measures, grouped by topic, showing monthly data, performance against target, long term trends and benchmarking where applicable. It also contains performance and service comments for each area to provide context.
Additional documents: Minutes: This report sets out performance data and trends for an agreed set of measures relating to looked after children for the period ending in July.
The Committee noted the following highlights:
· The number of children in care was declining at a steady level. There was also a good number of children moving in with relatives rather than foster carers.
· A child that had been in long term foster care had been adopted by the foster parents and this was a good success story.
· As of last week, there were no children missing from care.
· Good percentage of adoption and special guardianship orders.
Members asked if there could be more up to date performance information considered at future meetings as the performance figures considered were for the end of July .
Members questioned the definition of suitable accommodation[Op147] as following the discussions with Aspire it was felt necessary to look more closely at this performance area and understand what is meant by safe, suitable and secure and make sure this correlates with the understanding the young person has about the accommodation. Members noted that at seventeen and a half there are tenancy workshops for care leavers to attend and get a good understanding of the accommodation options and their responsibilities as tenants. It was clarified that care leavers do get priority in the housing bidding system and this had been made clear to the Head of Housing Support and Options. There was a requirement for the care leavers to attend the tenancy workshops and Members noted more work was being completed on securing better semi independent accommodation . There was also a meeting between the interim Director for Children Services and the Housing Improvement manager to discuss private rented opportunities and whether the potential to procure large properties as accommodation to be shared by care leavers.
Noted that there was a report due to the next meeting in December about housing for care leavers and this should include the work on: Ø finding suitable accommodation for care leavers. Ø Update on the work to procure better accommodation , Ø the work with RSLs , Ø support being given to young care leavers who are parents
Aspire had offered to complete inspections of properties and this was being considered.
|
|
Minutes: As below |
|
The report will update Members on the progress and results for Children in Care at the end of Reception, Key Stages 1, and 2 and 4.
Minutes: The Committee considered the report on LAC attainment and the report on the post 16 support of LAC together. As of September 2013 young people leaving Year 11 will be required to remain in Education, Employment or Training (ETE) until the end of the academic year in which they are 17, in 2015 this will increase to 18. Members noted the education and employment pathway being followed by the 53 looked after children at year 12 and also considered the progress and results for Children in Care at the end of Reception, Key Stages1, and 2 and 4, and Haringey’s Undergraduates/Graduates and new University entrants.
The key points noted by the Committee were:
· The Virtual School were continuing to work with young people not achieving good results at key stage 4 and encouraging them to stay on in school.
· The criteria for attainment at key stage 4 had changed and a level 4 achievement was required in all areas. There was progress in achieving the required level 4 at Maths and English and the Virtual school would look at the progress being made in the previous year to understand the support that was needed to reach level 4 in these required subject areas.
· Young people in care were being supported at 16+to stay in education and with some young people this meant encouraging re-engagement in education
· A strong set of GCSE results for Sep 2013, building on the legacy of previous years. These young people had benefited from additional input during their time in secondary school and have engaged with study club, libraries meetings, events, made use of online revision help through SAM. Further Examples of the one to one support was provided to reassure councillors of the quality of the contact being made by the Virtual school with pupils. It was noted that the Virtual school team will, on occasions and work load permitting, make visits to schools outside the borough being attended by LAC as well to understand the progress being made and speak with teachers if needed.
There was a question about whether Looked after Children are at a disadvantage in the Admission process and clarification sought on the support given to get LAC into a preferred choice of school. It was noted that the LAC will go through the admissions process in their placement borough and there will be support provided by the Virtual School if there are problems with getting a place at the child’s preferred school. In terms of Faith schools, they had their own admissions criteria. Sometimes it could be more difficult to place LAC in schools if they are at key stage 4 and in this case there would be further negotiation with schools but this was generally not thought to be a significant problem.
The Pupil Premium Plus grant was explained, and as of April there will be £1,900 per LAC for schools to spend money on. Committee members felt it would be useful to get a future report on ... view the full minutes text for item 260. |
|
Independent Advocacy Service - NYAS PDF 86 KB To receive an update on the Independent Visitor service and the chosen provider that will deliver this service. Minutes: At the previous meeting, the Committee had requested an update on the new provider chosen to take forward Independent visits the progress being made by them. The Committee noted that there were difficulties in attracting the right people to provide mentoring and advocacy support for young people in this, essentially, long term role. The new provider were working on compiling a diverse pool of volunteers . The Committee recommended encouraging people in the borough to volunteer. This could mean targeting staff, councillors and getting in touch with local community groups.
|
|
Draft Staying Put Policy PDF 187 KB The Committee to comment on an initial draft of the Staying Put Policy.
Minutes: The Committee were asked to comment on this draft policy .The service had been working to encourage young people to stay put in their placements at 18 and Foster carers were negotiated some incentives to keep their placements beyond 18. there was no w a need to create a policy and set out the preference which is to support young people to stay put with their foster care place as this will lead to better outcomes for them and provide them with some stability. There was a financial consideration as there would need to be some support given to foster carers to enable this to happen.
Social workers would support the LAC and foster carer coming to an agreement about living arrangements and what is expected by both parties as this will provide some independence for the young person and also enable the carer to be able to have some assurance in that there is an understanding of what is expected from the young person.
The Committee noted that there were currently 4 young people participating in stay put arrangements.
The YMCA project, that was funded by the council , is aimed at supporting and housing 16 to 24 year olds who are on the verge of homelessness was mentioned as this had the similar theme of helping young people stay in a family environment. Agreed that the report on accommodation also provide an update on the placement of young people in this project . although this was about placement of young people , it was a mediation project and different to the work of the staying put policy. Agreed it would also be worthwhile to include an update on the work with placing young people who are placed in the care of the council following the Southwark Judgement.
|
|
Fostering service review PDF 103 KB To consider the findings and recommendations arising from the review of the Fostering Service by iMPOWER. Report to follow Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee welcomed Varun Sitram and Ebony Hughes from iMPOWER to the meeting.
Following an internal audit of Fostering Service at the beginning of 2013 there were found to be a high level of deficiencies in the service. This service had not been of a consistent high quality standard in terms of its outcomes for children and young people and iMPOWER were enlisted in May to carry out a further external review of the service and had further carried out some extensive field work in this area . The review findings were put forward to Members along with recommendations on the way forward and an implementation plan for the service. These recommendations were compiled following consultation with key stakeholders, discussion with foster carers and staff. The main recommendation was to externalise the recruitment of foster carers to a separate organisation to effectively increase the number of foster carers in the borough and also cover the number of carers leaving the service through retirement.
IMPOWER had examined values and motivation around becoming a foster carer and considered the profiles in Haringey in comparison to similar boroughs and there was an opportunity to increase the number of in house foster carers living in Haringey. The merits of externalising the recruitment and assessment part of the service would allow the process to be completed more expediently and enable the council to better focus on support to the foster carers, once recruited, which would remain with the council. The organisation that would be procured to undertake this recruitment role would have a detailed insight into foster caring and know the target areas for recruiting carers. It was envisaged that if the recommendations were endorsed, the chosen organisation would start work in April 2014. Between now and April, there would need to be a strong contract compiled, ensure there was a robust project plan and a strong sufficiency and placements strategy in place to enable the organisation to do their work effectively. The following key actions would need to be completed in the coming 6 months: a mapping exercise to set out the implications of the externalisation, IT process change , and the governance system and a risk analysis system compiled and put in place.
Committee members were provided with an example of a comparator borough which had a higher number of foster carers recruited following the externalisation of the recruitment arm of the service.
Members of the committee were keen for officers to progress quickly with the procurement process to enable the increase in foster carers to happen as soon as possible. They were advised by iMPOWER representatives of the importance of compiling a robust governance process so that there was clarity on the actions that would be taken forward by the chosen organisation and what the responsibilities of the council were. There was also a need to consider the capacity of the foster care support team and understand if there was enough to deal with the anticipated increase in the number of foster ... view the full minutes text for item 263. |
|
Update on the development and implementation of the Quality Assurance Framework PDF 121 KB This report will provide an update on the development of the Children and Families Quality Assurance Framework, associated activities and documentation. Report to follow
Minutes: The Committee noted that the framework had been launched following the collation of findings and research into the current quality assurance methods in place. The framework provides a clear simple structure for collating and sharing information about major areas of concern and good practice. The original framework consists of 11 key areas of quality assurance activity which combined are designed to support the organisation at all levels in understanding areas of concern and need for improvement as well as demonstrating the progress being made. There has been a Quality Assurance Board in place since April which is chaired by the Interim Director of Children’s Services. This Board would look at the narratives and statistical information in place to ascertain if the services were below or meeting required standards.
A list of planned audit areas was provided at appendix 1 and it was explained that there will be qualitative data checks completed each week to understand workings in the associated service areas. Member considered the planned audit areas and wanted to be given more assurance about how, as Members, they were able to know if the required actions were being taken forward and completed in good time. There were some Members that felt the quality assurance report, which is considered by the officer body, should also come forward to this Committee. The Chair asked Members to keep in mind the role and remit of the committee which was responsible for looked after children and some of the audit actions were relating to safeguarding. Also there would be actions being taken forward that were operational and would be taken forward in business plans, service delivery plans and these were subject to management and performance monitoring.
Members agreed that there would need to be assurance given to them that services were addressing the quality issues, arising from audits , which affected the welfare of children in care. As a starting point it was suggested considering the leaflet provided to councillors, a few years, ago about their role as corporate parents. Members could consider this and provide comments on the areas they wanted feedback on in relation to the care and welfare of LAC and care leavers |
|
Friends and Family Policy PDF 129 KB The Committee to comment on an initial first draft of the Friends and Family Policy. Report to Follow Additional documents: Minutes: The enclosed policy is designed to demonstrate the council’s strong commitment to supporting relatives and family friends who step in to care for children when the child's parents are facing serious difficulties or challenges.
The policy sets out the different situations within which family members and friends may be caring for children and provides information on the support available from the Children and Young People’s Service.
The draft policy was put forward for initial discussion and comment by Members. There would need to be funding made available for extended families taking on the care of a child, in accordance with the recent Tower Hamlets Judgement. There was a recognition by the council that they should make available training, ongoing development and a support network for family and friends taking on the responsibility of the care for a child.
Legal comments were due to be added to the document and there would be explicit link to government guidance.
Members initial comments on the policy included:
· The need to advocate the training aspect of the support to be provided as this will help with combating fears of isolation.
· The friend and family caregiver role was different to the special guardianship role as this was subject to legal assessment .
Members of the Committee were invited to put forward any further comments to the Deputy Director.
|
|
New Items of urgent business To consider new items of business as per item 2. Minutes: None |
|
Exclusion of the press and public That the press and public be excluded from the meeting for consideration of the following items as they contain exempt information as defined in Section 100a of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended by Section 12A of the Local Government Act 1985): paras 1 & 2: namely information relating to any individual, and information likely to reveal the identity of an individual. Minutes: Not required |
|
New Items of exempt Business To consider t any new items of exempt business as per item 2.
Minutes: None |
|
Any other business The Joint meeting of the Children’s Safeguarding Policy and Practice Committee and Corporate Parenting Committee will be on Tuesday 05th November 2013 7.00pm Council Chamber.
The next Corporate Parenting meeting will take place on 19th December 6.30pm. Minutes: Next Meeting on Thursday 19th December 2013 6.30pm |