Agenda and minutes

None

The Chair will consider the admission of any late items of urgent business. Where the item is already included on the agenda, it will be dealt with under that item but new items of urgent business will be dealt with at item 6

None

A member with a personal interest in a matter who attends a meeting of the authority at which the matter is considered must disclose to that meeting the existence and nature of that interest at the commencement of that consideration, or when the interest becomes apparent.

A member with a personal interest in a matter also has a prejudicial interest in that matter if the interest is one which a member of the public with knowledge of the relevant facts would reasonably regard as so significant that it is likely to prejudice the member's judgement of the public interest.

None received

To receive the views of Site secretaries and allotment holders on the current Allotment service provision.

A member of the public spoke about the current consultation proposals on the future use of St Ann’s Hospital and  he referred to a strip of land of around 500 metres in length at the back of St Ann’s hospital which could be utilised for allotments and a City Farm. The location of the hospital was pertinent because it was located close to three wards (St Ann’s, Harringay and Seven Sisters) which had been recognised as being deficient in allotments. He urged the Review Panel to support this proposal.

The Panel heard from Allotment Site Secretaries regarding current allotment provision and how improvements could be made.

The Panel noted that £100,000 had been allocated to improving allotments as part of the Parks Improvement Programme for 2005/6 which was welcomed. There had been discussions between Allotment Committees and Parks managers on this expenditure , however many wished Site Secretaries to be involved and any funds available for the next year should be the subject of detailed consultation. It was felt that there should be more transparency in the budget process and the needs and priorities of particular sites should be clearly identified. Also it was felt that more information posted on the Council’s Website, such as details on Waiting Lists, the tenancy Agreement and general advise would be advantageous.

Maintenance was raised as an area of concern. Overgrown trees either on sites or on private land hanging over allotments was seen as a particular issue for Allotment holders. However it was noted that there was a limited budget for dealing with the aging tree population. Issues were raised regarding Rectory Farm Allotments around site inspections, no water and  skip removal. Officers agreed to investigate. Allotment sites which were semi self- managed with their own grants were expected to hire their own skips, whereas those sites without grants were able to hire skips through Council offices. A view was expressed that the same policy should apply to all sites. It was officers responsibility it was to ensure that any works carried out commissioned by the Council were of a sufficient standard and that value for money was being obtained. 

The representatives considered that communication between the Council and Allotment Associations would be improved by the introduction of a Newsletter. The meeting was informed that a yahoo e-mail allotments group had been set up and the possibility of tapping into the Parks Forum Friends Group should be explored. It was agreed that publicity should be given to the next Parks Forum on 7 January 2006.  There was support for the establishment of an Allotments Forum. It was also suggested that allotment events should be organised across the Borough. Site Secretaries requested that information on the ethnic make up of their plot holders be shared with them so that they could give out information in the various community languages and to assist them with applying for external funding. It was agreed that the current pack given to new tenants be sent to Site Secretaries to ensure that they had the most up to date information.

A key issue for Site Secretaries was the lack of sufficient plots with most sites having long or even closed waiting lists. They felt the procedure for dealing with neglected plots should be simplified. However the meeting noted plot holders subjected to dirty plot letters could invoke the Council’s complaints procedure and this was a lengthy process. The meeting acknowledged that there could be circumstances which temporarily prevented plot holders from maintaining their plots and therefore there should  ...  view the full minutes text for item 5.

To deal with any new items of urgent business admitted at item 2 above.

None