Agenda and minutes

Apologies for absence were received on behalf of Cllr Dodds for whom Cllr Stanton was substituting.

The Chair will consider the admission of any late items of urgent business.  Late items will be considered under the agenda item where they appear.  New items will be dealt with at item 17 below.

New items of exempt business will be dealt with at item 17 below. Late items will be considered under the agenda item where they appear.  New items will be dealt with at item 17.

Cllr Bevan raised concern that planning enforcement within the borough may not be carried out satisfactorily.  That the Committee had received a Planning Enforcement Review report at it’s meeting in June 2006, where officers had agreed to present a further proposal and to date this had not been received.  He requested when it was likely that the follow up report would be presented to the Committee.

A member with a personal interest in a matter who attends a meeting of the authority at which the matter is considered must disclose to that meeting the existence and nature of that interest at the commencement of that consideration, or when the interest becomes apparent.

A member with a personal interest in a matter also has a prejudicial interest in that matter if the interest is one which a member of the public with knowledge of the relevant facts would reasonably regard as so significant that it is likely to prejudice the member's judgement of the public interest.

Cllr Bevan declared an interest in the decision to be taken under agenda item 12.  “I am on the Board of The Lea Valley Park Authority, but have no involvement with the planning committee of The Park Authority.  My position is that I genuinely believe that I have only a personal interest.  However, as the Park planning committee have submitted a very strong and definitive statement objecting to this application, I will not take any part in this application.  This is a matter of caution and to avoid any possible controversy concerning public perception on this occasion”.

To consider receiving deputations and/or petitions in accordance with Standing Order 37

None received.

To confirm and sign the Minutes of the PASC meetings held on :

1. Thursday 28 September 2006
2. Thursday 12 October 2006 (Special)

PASC ~ 28 September 2006

Cllr Bevan requested confirmation that Thames Water had complied with condition 8, of the approved planning application (minute PASC66).  The submission to the Planning Authority the precise details of the materials to be used in connection with the development.  Officers confirmed that discussions would take place upon receipt of the agreement from the GLA and GOL for the application to proceed and which was expected to be received on 31 October 2006.

RESOLVED

That the minutes of the meetings held on the following dates were agreed and signed as an accurate record:

1. PASC ~ Thursday 28 September 2006
2. Special PASC ~ Thursday 12 October 2006

Appeal decisions determined during September 2006.

The Committee was advised of the appeal decisions determined during September 2006, 15 appeals were heard of which 4 were allowed and 11 dismissed.  The report detailed appeals allowed which included a conversion for a small house into two flats and the erection of a mobile phone mast in Lordship Lane. 

Members raised concern about whether there was a pattern in the award of costs made against the Borough.  Officers reassured Members that costs awarded against Haringey were very unusual and applied to 2 or 3 applications per year with minimal costs awarded. 

RESOLVED

That the report be noted.

Decisions made under delegated powers between 18 September 2006 and 15 October 2006

Members were asked to note the decisions taken under delegated powers between 18 September 2006 and 15 October 2006.

To advise Members of Performance Statistics on Development Control.  

The Committee were asked to note the performance statistics on Development Control work since the 12 October 2006 committee meeting.  There were no major applications determined however, minor applications were at the Haringey target.  The year performance showed that Haringey were below target for major and on target for minor applications.  Other applications were above the target set by the Government.

RESOLVED

That the report be noted.

To confirm the following Tree Preservation Order : Seymour Court, Colney Hatch Lane  N10

The Chair moved that there be a variation to the order of the agenda.  Members agreed to vary the order of the agenda and take item 17 before item 9.

RESOLVED

That the following Tree Preservation Order be confirmed, Seymour Court, Colney Hatch Lane N10:

• G1 Group comprising Pear, 2 x Sycamore, 1 x Ash (at rear)
• T1 Holm Oak (on frontage to Colney Hatch Lane)

To report the outcome of the public consultation exercise.

Mr Mark Lucas, Strategic Site and Projects Group, presented the report and advised that the Committee had approved The Draft Tottenham Hale Urban Centre Masterplan for formal public consultation at its meeting on 26 June 2006. 

The Masterplan and accompanying Sustainability Appraisal was the subject of a statutory consultation which commenced on 3 July and concluded on 28 August 2006.  The consultation attracted 330 responses from 30 respondents. The comments had been considered, taken into account and the incorporated changes set out in the final amended version of the Plan.

The Committee was invited to note the changes before being presented as a recommendation from the PASC to the Executive on 31 October 2006, for their adoption of the Masterplan as a Supplementary Planning Document.

Members raised concern regarding the Transport for London (TfL) response to the Masterplan which looked for a Section 106 framework to pool contributions for major transport infrastructure to support the Masterplan.  The Committee was advised that money raised through contributions from development within the masterplan boundaries would be reinvested within the Masterplan area and that this principal was firmly established, but that in the case, e.g. of making contributions towards the cost of major transport and infrastructure projects such as the Tottenham Gyratory, developments outside, but in the vicinity of the Masterplan area might be expected to contribute.

Members also queried the mix of affordable housing which would have an effect on school places demand. Officers responded by advising that existing policy guidance was in place to collect Section106 contributions from developers to mitigate the educational impact.   Members expressed concern about how mixed use development would work in practice and were advised that all applications in the Masterplan area would have to comply with UDP policies and national building regulations. There was also a supporting document to the Plan, The Tottenham Hale Urban Design Framework which detailed good urban design principles.  The Masterplan made it clear that there could be no growth without investment in supporting infrastructure.

The Committee noted that Tottenham Hale Station would be changed dramatically and questioned how this was to be implemented.  They were informed that TfL’s interchange team had appointed Colin Buchannon Associates, a firm of engineers to undertake a feasibility study to scope the necessary changes prior to commissioning actual design work.

RESOLVED

That the recommendations as detailed in the report were agreed.

(Cllr Stanton requested that his abstention be recorded)

To note and approve changes to Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) as a result of public consultation and the adoption of the Unitary Development Plan (UDP) in July 2006.

Officers presented the report and advised the Committee that it summarised the current position regarding the Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) The report recommended that five SPG be updated as an interim measure until the Council had started on a new framework document to replace the current SPG:

1. SPG1a:    Design Guidance
2. SPG3a:    Design, Dwelling Mix, Floorspace Minima, Conversions,      Extensions and Lifetime Homes
3. SPG8a:    Waste and Recycling
4. SPG10a:  The Negotiation, Management and Monitoring of Planning   Obligations
5. SPG10b:  Affordable Housing

Affordable housing SPG was adopted on an interim basis as the current SPG did not correlate with the main framework and will be the first subjected to a review as part of the new planning framework.  It would be followed by the SPG on conservation to take place in line with the public consultation on Conservation Area Character Appraisals.  The report also brought to the Committee guidance on the Code of Practice on employment and training the second on health.

RESOLVED

That the recommendations as detailed in the report be agreed.

In accordance with Sub Committee's protocol for hearing representations; when the recommendation is to grant planning permission, two objectors may be given up to 6 minutes (divided between them) to make representations.  Where the recommendation is to refuse planning permission, normally no speakers will be heard.  For items considered previously by the sub committee and deferred, where the recommendation is to grant permission, one objector may be given up to 3 minutes to make representations.  Where the recommendation is to refuse permission, normally no speakers will be heard.

RESOLVED

That the decisions of the Sub Committee on the planning applications and related matters be approved or refused with the following points noted.

Provisions of 4 business barges and associated mooring facilities, landscaping and associated parking.  RECOMMENDATION: Grant permission subject to conditions.

Officers presented the report and advised that this application had been deferred at the meeting of the PASC on 28 September 2006 to allow for a further consultation upon the receipt of a Design and Access statement in connection with the application.  The Committee noted that Hale Wharf was located on the River Lee Navigation System and the business barges would be moored on the western side of Hale Wharf on the eastern bank of the River Lea Navigation.  The site was accessible from Ferry Lane. 

The application needed to be assessed against the Blue Ribbon Network Policies in section 4c of the London Plan 2004.  The report detailed that the Lee Valley Regional Park had requested this application should be time limited.  Officers had not acceded to the request.  Members queried why it was not possible to time limit the application and were advised that the barges were for business use.  A new application would be required to change the use of the barges however, the Committee could make this a condition of the application if it was granted.

The committee heard from a representative of the Regents Network and the London Waterways Commission who had tabled a letter sent to the Authority outlining their objections to the application.  The main objection raised was around access to the site which was believed to be insufficient and inaccessible to the disabled and that the application did not meeting the BRN policies, specifically sections 4c, 12 and 19.

The applicant’s representative spoke on behalf of British Waterways London and stated the scheme would re-invigorate this part of the Borough which was largely unexploited and would bring about a revival of the waterways.  A large number of groups and other organisations had been consulted on the proposed application. 

Cllr Oakes entered the meeting at this point in the proceedings

Members discussed the application in detail and queried the size and width of the barges, how much space each barge would take up in the waterway.  Clarification was also provided on the types of businesses which had already expressed an interest in using the barges. 

The Chair moved to a vote to grant the application.  Members voted 6 in favour and 1 abstention.  The application was granted subject to conditions.

INFORMATION RELATING TO APPLICATION REF: HGY/2006/1741

FOR PLANNING APPLICATIONS SUB COMMITTEE DATED 30/10/2006

Location: Hale Wharf, Ferry Lane, N17 9NF

Proposal Provision of 4 x business barges with associated mooring facilities, landscaping and associated parking.

Recommendation

Decision GTD

Drawing No.s WNCAAW-130-102;

186/008; 186/028 & HWCB/P3758/01.

Conditions and/or Reasons

1.        The development hereby authorised must be begun not later than the expiration of 3 years from the date of this permission, failing which the permission  shall be of no effect.

Reason: This condition is imposed by virtue of the provisions of the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and to prevent the accumulation of  unimplemented planning permissions.

2.        The development hereby authorised shall be carried out in complete accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to,  ...  view the full minutes text for item 101.

Renewal of planning permission for erection of single storey and two storey rear extensions and rear dormer window, and change of use to day nursery.  RECDOMMENDATION: Grant permission: Subject to conditions

The Committee were informed that this application was a large mid terraced two storey property located directly opposite Ducketts Common.  The application was a renewal of planning permission for a change of use from a house to a nursery.  The site had four off street parking spaces to be used for carers leaving and collecting children.  The applicant had stated that recommendations from the Council’s Early Years Service had been incorporated into the internal layout of the building.  The hours of operation would be between 8:00am and 6:00pm.

Members queried whether there was any difference between the previous application and the one before them and were advised there was none.   Members went on to question the impact of noise and traffic during the hours of operation and were advised by officers that initially the application had detailed occupation of the premises by 40 children.  There was now a condition attached to reduce the number of children to 30, to minimise any adverse impact on neighbouring properties.  Members requested that a condition be applied for a detailed scheme for the provision of refuge.

The Chair moved to a vote to grant the application.  Members voted 7 in favour and 1 against.  The application was granted subject to conditions and the added condition.

INFORMATION RELATING TO APPLICATION REF: HGY/2006/1222

FOR PLANNING APPLICATIONS SUB COMMITTEE DATED 30/10/2006

Location: 24 Willoughby Road N8 0JE

Proposal Renewal of planning permission for erection of single storey and two storey rear extensions and rear dormer window, and change of use to day nursery.

Recommendation  GTD

Decision GTD

Drawing No.s 02.05.01e, 02e, 03d, 04c, 05d, 06c

Conditions and/or Reasons

1.             The development hereby authorised shall be carried out in complete accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to, and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

                Reason: In order to ensure  the development is carried out in accordance with the approved details and in the interests of amenity.

2.             The construction works of the development hereby granted shall not be carried out before 0800 or after 1800 hours Monday to Friday or before 0800 or after 1200 hours on Saturday and not at all on Sundays or Bank Holidays.

                Reason: In order to ensure that the proposal does not prejudice the enjoyment of neighbouring occupiers of their properties.

3.             That this permission shall be for a limited period expiring on 30 October 2007 when the use hereby approved  shall be discontinued and determined and the land reinstated to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority.

                Reason: In order to  enable the :Local Planning Authority to review and assess the use following experience after a period of operation.

4.             Notwithstanding the figures for children numbers shown on the approved drawing no more than 30 children including babies under 12 months, shall occupy the premises at any one time.

                Reason: In order to limit the total number of occupants in the interests of the amenity of current and future occupants in the premises and locality.

5.             The use hereby  ...  view the full minutes text for item 102.

Erection of a 4 storey rear extension and change of use of upper floors to create 4 x one bed, 4 x two bed and 1 x three bed self contained flats with alterations to rear elevation including creation of new staircase and courtyard with bicycle storage at first floor level.  RECOMMENDATION: Grant permission subject to conditions and a Legal Agreement.

The Committee was informed that this application relates to a large building situated on the High Road N22.  The proposed scheme was considered  to be consistent with the scale and bulk of the buildings that were present along this part of the High Road.  The development would have a density of 457hrh slightly over the maximum density level however, due to the Town Centre Location it was considered to be acceptable.  

The report highlighted a number of objections received from local residents and Burghley Road Area Residents Association who opposed the application  maintained their objections.

The Committee were asked to note that this scheme was a car free development and an informative to this effective was stated as part of the recommendations.

Members discussed the application and agreed to grant the application subject to conditions and a S106 Legal agreement and the following extra conditions :

1. Amendment to condition 5 that the windows of flats 2.1 and 2.2 should also be obscured.
2. That there should be a bicycle storage area within the scheme.
3. That a combined satellite dish system be installed for all the flats.

INFORMATION RELATING TO APPLICATION REF: HGY/2006/1309

FOR PLANNING APPLICATIONS SUB COMMITTEE DATED 30/10/2006

Location: 1 - 3 High Road N22 6BH

Proposal Erection of a 4 storey rear extension and change of use of upper floors to create 4 x one bed, 4 x two bed and 1 x three bed self contained flats with alterations to rear elevation including creation of new staircase and courtyard with bicycle storage at first floor level. (Amended plans detailing changes to second and third floor rear elevations received 02/10/06)

Recommendation  LEGAL

Decision LEGAL

Drawing No.s 649-01, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, 21, 25, 30, 31A, 32B, 33B, 34A, 37, 38B, 41B, 50A

Conditions and/or Reasons

RECOMMENDATION 1

The Sub-Committee is recommended to RESOLVE as follows:(1) That planning permission be granted in accordance with planning application no. HGY/2006/1309, subject to a pre-condition that the owners of the application site shall first have entered into an Agreement or Agreements with the Council under Section 106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (As Amended) and Section 16 of the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1974 in order to secure:

(1.1)        A contribution of £33,639.09 towards educational facilities within the Borough (£15,854.99 for primary and £17,784.10 for secondary) according to the formula set out in Policy UD10 and Supplementary Planning Guidance 12 of the Haringey Unitary Development Plan July 2006. Plus 5% of this amount as recovery costs / administration / monitoring which equates to £1681.95 This gives a total amount for the contribution of £35,321.04.

(1.2)    A contribution of £20,000 towards environmental improvements within the Borough

RECOMMENDATION 2

That planning permission be GRANTED in accordance with planning application no. HGY2006/1309 and Applicant's drawing No.(s) 649-01, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, 21, 25, 30, 31A, 32B, 33B, 34A, 37, 38B, 41B, 50A subject to the following conditions:

1.             The development hereby authorised must be begun not later than the expiration  ...  view the full minutes text for item 103.

Demolition of existing building and erection of 5 x four bed, 1 x three bed and 1 x two bed houses with rooms at lower ground floor level, associated car parking and landscaping.  RECOMMENDATION: Grant permission subject to conditions and Legal Agreement

Members having read the report prior to attendance at the Committee felt it was prudent to request a site visit.

RESOLVED

That the decision on this application was delayed for a site visit.  

Change of use from industrial unit to museum and education centre.  RECOMMENDATION: Grant permission subject to conditions.

The Committee were informed that this site comprised the northern most section of a builders yard and was formerly used by the Lotus Motorcar Company.   The proposal was for a change of use from Builders Merchants to Museum and Education Centre.  The site was within a defined employment area and is designated a site of historical heritage interest in the UDP.   The application would restore the premises back to its former glory and would provide the Council with a unique tourist attraction as well as bring employment within the defined employment area.

Members questioned whether parking spaces were to be provided and how many.  The report outlined there would be approximately six parking spaces available for visitors.  Members agreed to grant the application subject to conditions.

INFORMATION RELATING TO APPLICATION REF: HGY/2006/0203

FOR PLANNING APPLICATIONS SUB COMMITTEE DATED 30/10/2006

Location: 7 Tottenham Lane N8 8PR

Proposal Change of use from industrial unit to museum and education centre (amended description).

Recommendation GTD

Decision GTD

Drawing No.s 1, 2, 3, 3A, 3B, 4 - 23 incl.

Conditions and/or Reasons

1.             The development hereby authorised must be begun not later than the expiration of 3 years from the date of this permission, failing which the permission  shall be of no effect.

                Reason: This condition is imposed by virtue of the provisions of the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and to prevent the accumulation of  unimplemented planning permissions.

2.             The development hereby authorised shall be carried out in complete accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to, and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

                Reason: In order to ensure  the development is carried out in accordance with the approved details and in the interests of amenity.

3.             The development hereby authorised is for the change of use of the premises only. The insertion of windows and any external works to the building's fabric including signage will require a separate Planning application to be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority.

                Reason: To protect the architectural character of the site.

4.             The use hereby permitted shall not be operated before 0700 or after 1900 hours on any day.

                Reason: This permission is given to facilitate the beneficial use of the premises whilst ensuring that the amenities of neighbouring residential properties are not diminished.

5.             The construction works of the development hereby granted shall not be carried out before 0800 or after 1800 hours Monday to Friday or before 0800 or after 1200 hours on Saturday and not at all on Sundays or Bank Holidays.

                Reason: In order to ensure that the proposal does not prejudice the enjoyment of neighbouring occupiers of their properties.

6.             Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town & Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 the premises shall be used as a Lotus Motorcar Museum and Education Centre only and shall not be used for any other purpose including any purpose within Class D1 and B1 unless approval is obtained to a variation of this condition through the submission of  ...  view the full minutes text for item 105.

To consider any items admitted at item 2 above.

There were no new items of urgent business submitted.

Members, applicants and objectors are requested please to bring their diaries in the event that a site visit needs to be arranged.

1-4 Connaught House, 38 Connaught Gardens N10

A site visit was confirmed to take place on Friday 24 November 2006 at 9:30am at the site. 

Monday 27 November 2006 at 7:00pm.

Monday 27 November 2006 at 7:00pm (scheduled meeting)

Monday 11 December 2006 at 7:00pm (scheduled meeting)

Monday 15 January 2007 at 7:00pm (special meeting)

The meeting ended at 10:00pm.