Issue - meetings

To consider any requests received in accordance with Standing Orders.

Deputation 1 – MTFS proposal of reduction in Library opening hours

Joanna Bornat introduced the deputation on behalf of all library friends’ groups in Haringey and expressed concerns about the 31% cut in library budgets. She emphasised that this cut, disproportionate to the 3% deficit, would cause irreparable harm to libraries in Haringey. Despite acknowledgement of the Council's difficult position, she stressed that libraries were a statutory service and vital free spaces for all residents. Key concerns were raised about the lack of comprehensive evidence for footfall measurement and potential declines in library usage due to varied opening hours. The loss of skilled staff and absence of an adequate equalities impact assessment were emphasised. Questions were raised about the proposed timeline and transparency regarding assessed cuts. Advocacy was made for a more transparent consultation process like those conducted by the London Borough of Enfield Council, and the need for improved co-production models based on experiences was stressed.

In response to questions from the Cabinet, the deputation party responded as follows:

-       There were concerns about the proposed transformation, and there was felt to be some ambiguity about them and potential negative impacts.

-       There was further consideration needed on the vital role of libraries in the community and they should not be used as experiments in co-production.

-       There was scepticism about the effectiveness of co -production initiatives suggested, based on past negative experiences.

-       The Stroud Green Haringey Friends Group, representative mentioned that he was from one of the friends’ groups that had been alienated by the current process.

-       A representative of Highgate Library Action Group commended Haringey for its successful maintenance of library services, and highlighted absence of library closures in the borough. On co- production, he expressed uncertainty and emphasised the need for further clarification. He further cited examples where other organisations assumed aspects of library management, which had resulted in undesirable outcomes. He continued to voice concern about the proposed 31% reduction in library funding whilst acknowledging the broader challenges faced by Haringey Council.

The Cabinet Member for Culture, Communities & Leisure, responded to the deputation. Libraries were acknowledged for their crucial role in the community, and provided essential services for literacy, social interaction, and mental well-being. Despite financial constraints, efforts had been made to protect and enhance Haringey's libraries. It was noted that since 2010, core government funding had decreased by £143 million in real terms. Haringey's libraries were protected from closures, with £4.9 million invested in upgrades for several branches. However, unsustainable hours of operation had necessitated a review.

Data and staff knowledge would be utilised to optimise library hours and peak times. The Cabinet Member confirmed that an individual equality impact assessment would be undertaken for each library. Appropriate action would follow this to mitigate impacts on vulnerable groups. The budget decision timeline was constrained by legal requirements, which limited the duration of consultations. The comparison with the London Borough of Enfield Council's consultation was noted as misleading, as their consultation focused on  ...  view the full minutes text for item 82