8 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: PDF 28 KB
(i) GOL – Annual Review update (attached).
(ii) SSCF – first six months review (attached).
(iii) Draft Performance Management Framework (attached).
Additional documents:
Minutes:
(i) GOL – Annual Review update
The Board noted the report before it and the update provided that highlighted that the HSP had been rated as an amber-green partnership by GOL following the completion of the annual review process. The Board heard that where a “red light” within the assessment was highlighted under the Employment category, this would encapsulate the NEETS agenda and that the Board would be encouraged to give this consideration in the near future. In addition, this would be related to consideration of the contingencies that in place should a bid for LEGI be unsuccessful.
RESOLVED
The Board agreed to consider NEETS and mortality rates on a future agenda as result of the GOL Annual Review.
(ii) SSCF – first six month review
This item would be dealt with at Item 9 of the Agenda.
(iii) Draft Performance Management Framework
The Board was informed of the conceptual discussions that had taken place over the proposed performance management framework (PMF) for the HSP as set out in the report before the Board. Having heard from the HSP Review that PMF was a requirement, the proposals outlined were largely agreed by the Board with the proviso that there should be a greater role for residents to participate in the HSP and its performance assessment by both qualitative and quantitative methods.
RESOLVED
The Board agreed the development of the HSP performance management framework in line with the proposed model, in time for the start of the LAA. It also agreed to consider the resources required for the performance management function of the HSP.