205 Extension and Variation of the Nuisance Vehicle Contract
PDF 134 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member noted the report which sought approval for the extension and variation of the Nuisance Vehicle contract with NSL Limited. The report also sought approval to vary the contract to increase the annual payment by a maximum of £28k per annum to pay for an additional abandoned vehicle inspector and performance related payments towards additional operating costs.
RESOLVED
I. That the extension of the nuisance vehicle contract be approved, for a period of
two years, as permitted under the Contract and in accordance with CSO
10.021(b).
II. That approval be given for a variation of the contract as permitted under Clause 45.1 and in accordance with CSO 10.02.1(b), to increase the annual payment by
£28k to cover the cost of an additional abandoned vehicle inspector and
contribution towards rising operating costs, bringing the total cost to
£2,843,776.
Reasons for decision
The Council was required to make provision for the removal of nuisance vehicles,
which comprises of vehicles which are generally in a very bad condition
abandoned on the highway.
This contract was key to ensuring the delivery of the Council’s statutory duties
including the safety requirements in and around Spurs Football Ground, where
it is imperative that the surrounding streets comprising the emergency
evacuation routes and safety corridor are kept clear.
Additionally, this contract underpins the strategy for dealing with vehicles that
have accumulated high volumes of unpaid Penalty Charge Notices (commonly
referred to as Persistent Evaders) that represent a significant amount of debt;
there would be no ability to deal with this category of debt without the provision
of removal vehicles included as part of the contract.
The routine removal of vehicles under the Traffic Management Act also
supports road safety.
Extending and varying the current contract is the recommended option, the
reasons for this are provided below.
The original contract award allowed for the option to extend for two years.
There were operational difficulties at the beginning of the three-year contract, in
particular the council had to support the contractor in relation to the abandoned
vehicle operation. This area continues to be a pressure for them, possibly due
to a lack of their understanding at the bid stage about the full scale of the
operation.
However, overall performance has improved, and continues to do so this year,
with NSL consistently meeting the key performance indicators.
The contractor has in the past raised concerns about the financial viability of
this contract, and at the extension negotiations, were clear that they were
unwilling to extend the contract at the same cost. Some of these cost pressures
are due to them misunderstanding the scope of the abandoned vehicle side and
also due to there being no provision in the contract for RPI increases, which the
contractor has had to absorb.
Following negotiations between the Council and the contractor, the following
payments have been proposed:
per annum to improve the efficiency of the abandoned vehicle side of ... view the full minutes text for item 205