The Committee considered the report of the
Director of Place and Sustainability which recommended that Tree
Preservation Orders be confirmed against trees located at; 65
Mountview Road N4, 29 Ridge Road N8 and
Southwood Hall, Wood Lane N6.
- A local resident, Mr Whent, addressed the Committee regarding the
confirmation of the TPO at 65 Mountview
Road. It was clarified that the tree affected by the TPO in
question was that marked T1 in the Committee report and that T2 was
not the subject of a TPO. Mr Whent
advised that, without correct maintenance, the tree in question
could pose a threat to his property, as in the past a significant
amount of the tree had fallen into his garden. Mr Whent felt that given this fact, and that the tree
was not a rare species, a TPO should not be confirmed.
- Officers advised that it was not
possible to add a condition to a TPO requiring adequate
maintenance, but that there was a statutory duty in law to ensure
that trees were maintained so as not to pose any danger, and that
an informative could be added to advise that adequate maintenance
be undertaken.
- It was clarified that a TPO did not
mean that no works could be carried out on a tree, just that the
necessary application needed to be made. It was confirmed that the
application process was free of charge, although some concern was
expressed that the application process might put people off
carrying out works.
On a vote of 5 in
favour and 3 against, it was:
RESOLVED
That the TPO
against T1 at 65 Mountview Road, N4, be
confirmed, with an informative that adequate maintenance to the
tree be undertaken.
The Committee
advised the objector that the owner of the tree did have a legal
responsibility to maintain any tree to prevent it from becoming
dangerous, and suggested that he may wish to seek legal advice if
necessary to resolve the matter. It was also suggested that he
speak to his Ward Councillors.
It was further:
RESOLVED
That authority for
the confirmation of the remaining TPOs
outlined in the report be delegated to officers.