RECEIVED the Council’s Financial
Performance Forecast as at 30th September 2011 as laid
out on pages 29 – 41 of the agenda pack, introduced by Kevin
Bartle, Chief Finance Officer.
NOTED the following in response to questions
and discussion:
- There were 12 schools (including 3
secondary schools) with licensed deficits (deficits approved by the
Council and paid back over 3 years) and others with unapproved
deficits. The main reason for school
deficits was a drop in pupil numbers when a school was at a
comfortable spending position and then did not react to reduce
spending. The funding for a child did
not move with that child if they changed schools.
- Where a school was becoming an
academy and had a deficit: the deficit would remain with the local
authority for sponsored academies but converter academies deficits
would remain with the academy.
- It was explained that there had been
a delay in restructuring translation and interpretation services
(paragraph 5.3) due to the initial division for shared services
with other local authorities and collaboratives not working
out. It was suggested that the Council
approached HAVCO (Haringey Association of Voluntary and Community
Organisations) to discuss translation and interpretation
requirements rather than commercial organisations.
- The Techno Park was particularly
underachieving in terms of budgeted levels (targets, paragraph 8.1)
and would be included in the Council’s property review
looking into how properties could be better utilised.
- It was reported that the Council had
applied to the Government for £300k for support to businesses
affected by the summer riots, £250k rate relief plus a
£1.5 million claim through the Recovery Scheme. The Council was not waiting for the Government
funds to come through before providing support to those
affected.
- Following the end of the Making the
Difference budgets a member asked whether area committees would
receive alternative funds to allocate.
The Assistance Chief Executive stated that this would be discussed
at a future meeting of area committee chairs
RESOLVED that the report be
noted and the following actions be delegated to the appropriate
directorate/ officers:
The Committee would be sent
figures for schools that had been in deficit the previous year (for
comparison against the 12 schools forecasting deficits this year).
(Action 66.1)
Paragraph 4.4 - Adult Care
Packages – The Committee requested further explanation on the
pressures for identified across Adults Commissioning. (Action 66.2)
Paragraph 7.15 – Pupil
Premium – The Committee requested a briefing detailing the
schools that would benefit from the increase in pupil premiums with
the schools identified by ward and including the annual amount that
they would receive. (Action 66.3.1)
The Committee requested a
briefing on the Affordable Housing Project. (Action
66.3)