237 CHILD PROTECTION PERFORMANCE AND KEY ISSUES REPORT
PDF 596 KB
To consider and note the update report on
child protection performance.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
RECEIVED the update report on
key performance information on child protection (pages 87-100 of
the agenda pack), introduced by Marion Wheeler (Assistant Director
for Safeguarding). A discussion
followed.
NOTED
- The Committee
questioned the discrepancy between the figures provided on Page 90
(Children with a Child Protection Plan (CPP) moving into the
Borough) and Page 115 (minutes of the previous Child Protection
Overview & Scrutiny Committee meeting) of the agenda
pack. Page 90 stated that 43 Children
on CPPs had moved-into the Borough and 36 had moved out since
January 2011 and Page 115 provided the figure of 40 children on
CPPs moving into the Borough. The
Director of Children and Young People’s Service would
investigate and provide Committee members with an explanation
(Action No. 237.1).
- In response to
questioning it was reported that where assessments were not
completed within timescales managers would establish the reasons,
however, some assessments were immensely complex and meeting high
standards of work was a priority.
- The Director of
Children and Young People’s Service and Councillor Joseph
Ejiofor would be meeting to discuss how information should be
reported to the Committee and would include how to clarify the
performance indicators NI 59 and NI60 (Action No. 237.2).
- The Committee asked
for a presentation at a future meeting on the causes for delays in
assessments (Action No. 237.3).
- A piece of work had
recently been conducted within the Children’s Services
department on how child protection had been audited over the past
two years and meeting quality standards and timings. It was agreed that a presentation on the results
of this piece of work would be presented to the Committee at a
future meeting.
- First Response
process was explained to the Committee and in response to
questioning it was reported that the First Response team did not
always write to people, by way of a follow-up, who had contacted
the First Response team as this could compromise cases or
confidentiality.
RESOLVED to note the
report.