Decision Maker: Assistant Director for Regeneration and Economic Development
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
For the Assistant Director of Regeneration and
Economic Development to approve the implementation of Contract
Standing Order 9.07.1c. and award a contract for the RIBA stage 1-2
Masterplan to 5th Studio for the period October 2019 – April
2020 for the value of £46,400.
An Invitation to Tender Process was carried
out by the Regeneration Team in line with the council’s
Contract Standing Orders, using the GLA’s Architecture,
Design and Urbanism Panel (ADUP) framework. The Invitation to
Tender (at Appendix 3) was sent to all nine companies on the list
for Lot 2 of the framework 'Site Masterplanning and Development
Feasibility’. This process attracted one tender.
The single submitted tender was evaluated by a panel made up of two
Regeneration Officers, a representative from Arriva and a
representative from Levene’s Solicitors – as these are
partners who are co-funding the masterplan. The tender was
evaluated as per Section 3 ‘Tender Evaluation Criteria’
in Appendix 2 in line with the ADUP guidance.
The price was submitted by the consultant as an overall price, but
also as a fee schedule that showed the fixed fees for the different
pieces of work within the overall contract. The fee breakdown can
be found at EXEMPT Appendix 5 – ‘5th Studio Fee
Schedule’.
The scores from all members of the Panel were high, the final score
being 88% which is a satisfactory endorsement of the 5th Studio bid
due to the range of critical perspectives who evaluated.
The Council could have decided not to procure
a masterplan but is a requirement in the draft Wood Green Area
Action Plan (AAP) that any planning application within the sites
SA2, SA3 or SA4 should be accompanied by a masterplan for all three
sites, to demonstrate that any planning application will not
compromise future redevelopment.
The Council could have waited for another landowner to deliver a
masterplan to meet the AAP requirement and proceed with
redevelopment but this option beings with it too much uncertainty
in terms of timing and quality. In undertaking the masterplan, the
Council has a higher level of control and visibility of when
redevelopment within the masterplan area will take place.
Furthermore, the process of procuring for a co-funded masterplan
means that the Council’s requirements can be aligned to the
key stakeholders that are Arriva and Levene’s.
The council could have gone back out to the market to get three
quotes, however the quality of this bid is good, and the price is
good value for money, so the decision was taken to appoint 5th
Studio.
Publication date: 04/11/2019
Date of decision: 31/10/2019