Members of the Committee to consider a summary of the Munro Review into Child Protection from the Independent Member.
Minutes:
The Committee noted that Eileen Munro had been commissioned by the Coalition government to undertake a review of child protection and make recommendations on how the system could be improved. Munro had compiled two previous reports, the first report was a system analysis of the current child protection system and how it had evolved and been shaped by key driving forces. The second report had looked at how the system could be reformed to keep focus on the child’s experiences from needing help to receiving it. The final third report from Munro brought together the issues arising from the first two reports. The Independent Member of the Committee had compiled a summary of Munro’s final report which contained proposals for changes to the child protection system. The key components of these recommendations were developing social work capacity; ensuring children were communicated with, and that the child was at the centre of the organisations process.
The Committee further learned that Munro had found the current Child Protection system to be reactive instead of proactive. The performance management culture had the impact of an organisation focussing on process and targets rather than outcomes for children and families. Also the current system did not take account of a child’s experiences. The following key recommendations from the Munro report were set out by the Independent Member:
The review also outlined the following areas for reform:
In considering the information from the Munro report the Independent Member advised the Committee that it was important to keep in mind that there was not an exemplary children’s service structure for local authorities to follow. The best way forward for local authorities was being aware of and making use of the best aspects of each others organisational forms
The Munro report also contained details of how the recommendations could be implemented; these were set out in pages 11 and 12 of the agenda pack. It was noted that a Government response to the review had just recently been published and was agreed that this information would be circulated to committee members.
A proposal, the Munro report, pertinent to the remit of the committee was for local authorities to set local performance indicators .This would include the local authority setting timescales for when initial assessments and core assessment were completed and deciding what other areas of children’s work should be monitored.
The committee noted the recommendation for serious case reviews to not be marked by Ofsted and learned that the council were already trialling other SCR methodologies and thought was being given to the timescales around completion of SCR’s.
The committee felt that clarification would be needed in future on which level of the Children’s services management structure the principal child and family social worker would be placed. It was noted that to be a deputy director of Children and Families service already required a social work qualification. However it was envisaged that this would be a separate post in the structure.
In response to a query on the current reporting lines of the LSCB‘s annual report, it was noted that the report was due to be considered by the Children’s Trust at their meeting in October.
A recommendation of the Munro report outlined the protection of the discrete roles held by the Cabinet Member for Children’s services and Director of Children’s services. The Committee commented that this would be an important recommendation for the local authority to keep in mind particularly at a time when other local authorities were examining the possibilities of merging their Children’s and Adults services.
Supporting documents: