Issue raised by Jacob O’Callaghan (Hornsey Historical Society):
To discuss the London Borough of Haringey Standards Board hearing held on 30th & 31st March 2011 investigating the complaint against the former Chair of the Board of Trustees.
Minutes:
RECEIVED the comments of Jacob O’Callaghan in relation to Haringey Council’s Standards Determination Hearing decision of 30th March 2011 (Page 39 of the agenda pack).
NOTED
1. Do the trustees, and the council solicitors, consider the licence given to Firoka either valid and binding, or, ultra vires and not binding? If the latter, will the trustees challenge that the charity’s funds should indemnify those losses and order they be not charged to the charity’s funds as a debt?
2. Have the trustees taken independent legal advice as to whether the charity’s various legal advisers should have (a) checked the final version of the licence and warned the trustees accordingly; (b) monitored and intervened on behalf of the charity to protect it during the licence period; (c) advised the trustees to terminate the licence with Firoka and evict them immediately after the successful JR, and (d) consider whether the charity or council should take action to recover the resultant losses to the charity, from those advisers?
3. Have the trustees taken advice as to legal action against Firoka Ltd for an account of profits during its occupation of the Palace?
AGREED
i. That the Board be requested to review the circumstances which lead to the Alexandra Palace and Park Charitable Trust entering into a binding agreement with Firoka in order to clear the air and ensure that lessons had been learnt and to prevent any such situation of a similar nature arising in future.
ii. That the Board be requested to consider recovering some of the financial losses to the Charitable Trust as part of the Firoka agreement.
iii. That Mr O’Callaghan provide a chronology of events relating to the Firoka agreement being signed as he understood them.
Supporting documents: